KROG.L vs. ESGB.L
KROG.L (Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and ESGB.L (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from Global X and VanEck respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROG.L returned -2.38%/yr vs 16.27%/yr for ESGB.L. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KROG.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ESGB.L.
Performance
KROG.L vs. ESGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROG.L achieves a 14.78% return, which is significantly higher than ESGB.L's -12.64% return.
KROG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 14.78%
- 1Y
- 10.50%
- 3Y*
- -2.38%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ESGB.L
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- 6M
- -14.55%
- YTD
- -12.64%
- 1Y
- -14.47%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 8.14%
- 10Y*
- —
KROG.L vs. ESGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROG.L Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 14.78% | 0.36% | -6.89% | -26.89% | -14.07% |
ESGB.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD | -12.64% | 18.62% | 51.10% | 25.90% | -21.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROG.L and ESGB.L is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2022 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KROG.L and ESGB.L has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROG.L vs. ESGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
KROG.L
ESGB.L
KROG.L vs. ESGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) and VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KROG.L | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.87 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | -0.52 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.39 | -0.83 | +3.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KROG.L vs. ESGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROG.L drawdown since its inception was -51.38%, which is greater than ESGB.L's maximum drawdown of -39.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROG.L and ESGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROG.L | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.38% | -39.40% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.21% | -27.68% | +19.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.00% | -27.68% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.96% | -24.34% | -14.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.47% | -13.30% | -21.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 17.34% | -12.94% |
Volatility
KROG.L vs. ESGB.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) is 4.14%, while VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that KROG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROG.L | ESGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 4.84% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.40% | 13.67% | -1.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.79% | 17.11% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 21.96% | -2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 22.69% | -3.30% |
KROG.L vs. ESGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ESGB.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
KROG.L vs. ESGB.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KROG.L nor ESGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
KROG.L and ESGB.L have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KROG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KROG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESGB.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROG.L and 0.55% for ESGB.L.
Find the right allocation for KROG.L and ESGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer