KROG.L vs. EMQP.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) and EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L).
KROG.L and EMQP.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KROG.L is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Feb 15, 2022. EMQP.L is a passively managed fund by HANetf that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Nov 5, 2021. Both KROG.L and EMQP.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KROG.L vs. EMQP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KROG.L vs. EMQP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROG.L Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 14.77% | 0.36% | -6.89% | -26.89% | -14.07% |
EMQP.L EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating | -17.67% | 10.86% | 14.87% | -1.35% | -18.06% |
Different Trading Currencies
KROG.L is traded in GBP, while EMQP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the EMQP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROG.L achieves a 14.77% return, which is significantly higher than EMQP.L's -17.67% return.
KROG.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- YTD
- 14.77%
- 6M
- 14.32%
- 1Y
- 12.33%
- 3Y*
- -7.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EMQP.L
- 1D
- 1.54%
- 1M
- -6.44%
- YTD
- -17.67%
- 6M
- -26.32%
- 1Y
- -15.36%
- 3Y*
- -0.59%
- 5Y*
- -11.88%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KROG.L vs. EMQP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than EMQP.L's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KROG.L vs. EMQP.L — Risk / Return Rank
KROG.L
EMQP.L
KROG.L vs. EMQP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) and EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KROG.L | EMQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | -0.74 | +1.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | -0.95 | +2.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.89 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | -0.50 | +2.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.47 | -1.34 | +4.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KROG.L | EMQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | -0.74 | +1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 0.06 | -0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between KROG.L and EMQP.L is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KROG.L vs. EMQP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither KROG.L nor EMQP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
KROG.L vs. EMQP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROG.L drawdown since its inception was -51.38%, smaller than the maximum EMQP.L drawdown of -67.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROG.L and EMQP.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROG.L | EMQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.38% | -67.77% | +16.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -28.88% | +19.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.96% | -56.50% | +17.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.20% | -37.88% | +3.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.79% | 10.81% | -7.02% |
Volatility
KROG.L vs. EMQP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) is 5.79%, while EMQQ Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce UCITS ETF - Accumulating (EMQP.L) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that KROG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMQP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KROG.L | EMQP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.79% | 7.16% | -1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 14.11% | -2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 20.58% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 31.46% | -11.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.56% | 32.29% | -12.73% |