PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ESGB.L (VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD) and ANRJ.L (Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ESGB.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while ANRJ.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ESGB.L returned 7.72%/yr vs 28.76%/yr for ANRJ.L. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ESGB.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ANRJ.L.

Performance

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ESGB.L is traded in GBP, while ANRJ.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ANRJ.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGB.L achieves a -13.64% return, which is significantly lower than ANRJ.L's 27.53% return.

ESGB.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.17%
YTD
-13.64%
6M
-17.20%
1Y
-11.47%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
—

ANRJ.L

1D
-0.73%
1M
-1.44%
YTD
27.53%
6M
25.69%
1Y
66.23%
3Y*
33.07%
5Y*
28.76%
10Y*
16.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ESGB.L
VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD		-13.64%18.62%51.06%25.92%-27.12%-1.36%80.84%10.77%
ANRJ.L
Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF		27.53%43.26%10.68%9.79%44.73%26.52%-27.94%-7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between ESGB.L and ANRJ.L is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.27

The correlation between ESGB.L and ANRJ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.41 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ESGB.L
ANRJ.L

Communication Services

76.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

14.2%
7.9%

Technology

8.9%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

25.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

44.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

20.6%

Communication Services

ESGB.L
76.9%
ANRJ.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

ESGB.L
14.2%
ANRJ.L
7.9%

Technology

ESGB.L
8.9%
ANRJ.L
1.4%

Basic Materials

ESGB.L

-

ANRJ.L
25.7%

Consumer Defensive

ESGB.L

-

ANRJ.L

-

Energy

ESGB.L

-

ANRJ.L

-

Financial Services

ESGB.L

-

ANRJ.L

-

Healthcare

ESGB.L

-

ANRJ.L

-

Industrials

ESGB.L

-

ANRJ.L
44.4%

Real Estate

ESGB.L

-

ANRJ.L

-

Utilities

ESGB.L

-

ANRJ.L
20.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD

Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF

Often compared with ESGB.L:
ESGB.L vs. ESPOESGB.L vs. DFNS.LESGB.L vs. XLKQ.LESGB.L vs. IITU.LESGB.L vs. XSTC.LESGB.L vs. AIAG.LESGB.L vs. EQQQ.L
Often compared with ANRJ.L:
ANRJ.L vs. PMLP.LANRJ.L vs. JEDG.LANRJ.L vs. AMEE.DEANRJ.L vs. JEDI.DEANRJ.L vs. SXR8.DEANRJ.L vs. DFNG.LANRJ.L vs. QDVE.DE

Return for Risk

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ESGB.L
ESGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
ESGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L
ANRJ.L Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANRJ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ESGB.LANRJ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.68
4.01

-4.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.86
5.12

-5.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.66

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.43

8.15

-8.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.76

26.14

-26.91

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGB.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.68, which is lower than the ANRJ.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGB.L and ANRJ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ESGB.LANRJ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.68

4.01

-4.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

1.36

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.66

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.49

+0.21

Drawdowns

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGB.L drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum ANRJ.L drawdown of -57.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB.L and ANRJ.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ESGB.LANRJ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.40%

-57.08%

+17.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.63%

-8.08%

-18.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.63%

-13.17%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.60%

-19.81%

-17.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-57.08%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.21%

-3.59%

-21.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.09%

-11.86%

-1.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.99%

2.53%

+12.46%

Volatility

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) is 3.96%, while Amundi ETF MSCI Europe Energy UCITS ETF (ANRJ.L) has a volatility of 6.93%. This indicates that ESGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANRJ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ESGB.LANRJ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

6.93%

-2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.09%

13.53%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.79%

16.43%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

21.21%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.81%

24.69%

-1.88%

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGB.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than ANRJ.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ESGB.L vs. ANRJ.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ESGB.L nor ANRJ.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

ESGB.L and ANRJ.L have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ANRJ.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ANRJ.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ESGB.L.

ESGB.L is categorized as Technology Equities, while ANRJ.L is Energy Equities. ESGB.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while ANRJ.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ESGB.L and 0.25% for ANRJ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ESGB.L and ANRJ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer