PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KROG.L vs. KLWD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KROG.L vs. KLWD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) and WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (KLWD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KROG.L is traded in GBP, while KLWD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the KLWD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KROG.L achieves a 15.06% return, which is significantly higher than KLWD.L's -5.67% return.


KROG.L

1D
0.44%
1M
0.37%
YTD
15.06%
6M
12.91%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
-1.94%
5Y*
10Y*

KLWD.L

1D
-2.99%
1M
18.10%
YTD
-5.67%
6M
-4.57%
1Y
-7.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KROG.L vs. KLWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KROG.L and KLWD.L is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KROG.L vs. KLWD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KROG.L
KROG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
KROG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

KLWD.L
KLWD.L Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
KLWD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLWD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLWD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
KLWD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLWD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KROG.L vs. KLWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) and WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (KLWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KROG.LKLWD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

0.99

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

-0.22

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.98

-0.52

+3.50

KROG.L vs. KLWD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KROG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the KLWD.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KROG.L and KLWD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KROG.LKLWD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

-0.22

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.45

0.05

-0.50

Drawdowns

KROG.L vs. KLWD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KROG.L drawdown since its inception was -51.38%, which is greater than KLWD.L's maximum drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROG.L and KLWD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KROG.LKLWD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.38%

-35.51%

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.21%

-34.77%

+26.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.81%

-10.71%

-28.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.39%

-11.11%

-23.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.11%

14.63%

-10.52%

Volatility

KROG.L vs. KLWD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X AgTech and Food Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (KROG.L) is 5.63%, while WisdomTree Cloud Computing UCITS ETF - USD Acc (KLWD.L) has a volatility of 15.82%. This indicates that KROG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KROG.LKLWD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.63%

15.82%

-10.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.20%

30.90%

-18.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

34.46%

-18.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.47%

33.83%

-14.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.47%

33.83%

-14.36%

KROG.L vs. KLWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

KROG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than KLWD.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

KROG.L vs. KLWD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither KROG.L nor KLWD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


KROG.L and KLWD.L have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KLWD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KLWD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROG.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROG.L and 0.40% for KLWD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KROG.L and KLWD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer