ESGB.L vs. XSTC.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L).

ESGB.L and XSTC.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Jun 24, 2019. XSTC.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Sep 12, 2017. Both ESGB.L and XSTC.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ESGB.L vs. XSTC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ESGB.L vs. XSTC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ESGB.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD	-11.51%	18.62%	51.06%	25.92%	-27.12%	-1.36%	80.84%	10.77%
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D	-7.90%	14.31%	39.50%	48.82%	-22.54%	33.47%	41.54%	12.34%

Different Trading Currencies

ESGB.L is traded in GBP, while XSTC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XSTC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ESGB.L achieves a -11.51% return, which is significantly lower than XSTC.L's -7.90% return.

ESGB.L

• 1D: 1.52%
• 1M: -0.88%
• YTD: -11.51%
• 6M: -23.37%
• 1Y: 3.47%
• 3Y*: 18.52%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: —

XSTC.L

• 1D: 2.97%
• 1M: -2.09%
• YTD: -7.90%
• 6M: -6.04%
• 1Y: 25.64%
• 3Y*: 22.91%
• 5Y*: 17.29%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ESGB.L vs. XSTC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ESGB.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XSTC.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

ESGB.L

VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD

XSTC.L

Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D

Return for Risk

ESGB.L vs. XSTC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ESGB.L

ESGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 15
ESGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
ESGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
ESGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 16
ESGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ESGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

XSTC.L

XSTC.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
XSTC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
XSTC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XSTC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
XSTC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ESGB.L vs. XSTC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ESGB.L	XSTC.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	1.08	-0.90
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	1.60	-1.22
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.21	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	1.42	-1.34
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	3.80	-3.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ESGB.L vs. XSTC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ESGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the XSTC.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ESGB.L and XSTC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ESGB.L	XSTC.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18	1.08	-0.90
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.36	0.78	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.96	-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between ESGB.L and XSTC.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ESGB.L vs. XSTC.L - Dividend Comparison

ESGB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSTC.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ESGB.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XSTC.L Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D	0.34%	0.33%	0.37%	0.53%	1.08%	0.53%	0.63%	0.60%

Drawdowns

ESGB.L vs. XSTC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ESGB.L drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, which is greater than XSTC.L's maximum drawdown of -29.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB.L and XSTC.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ESGB.L	XSTC.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.40%	-29.30%	-10.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.63%	-17.49%	-9.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.60%	-29.30%	-8.30%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.37%	-14.27%	-9.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.81%	-6.36%	-6.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.14%	6.55%	+4.59%

Volatility

ESGB.L vs. XSTC.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) has a higher volatility of 6.05% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA Information Technology UCITS ETF 1D (XSTC.L) at 5.21%. This indicates that ESGB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSTC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ESGB.L	XSTC.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.05%	5.21%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.78%	14.94%	-2.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.04%	23.77%	-4.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.23%	22.13%	+0.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.94%	22.42%	+0.52%