ESGB.L vs. AIAG.L
Compare and contrast key facts about VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAG.L).
ESGB.L and AIAG.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ESGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Jun 24, 2019. AIAG.L is a passively managed fund by Legal & General that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. It was launched on Jun 26, 2019. Both ESGB.L and AIAG.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ESGB.L vs. AIAG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ESGB.L vs. AIAG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESGB.L VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD | -11.51% | 18.62% | 51.06% | 25.92% | -27.12% | -1.36% | 80.84% | 6.41% |
AIAG.L L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF | -5.16% | 21.44% | 20.57% | 50.58% | -33.18% | 11.07% | 63.12% | -2.52% |
Different Trading Currencies
ESGB.L is traded in GBP, while AIAG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AIAG.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ESGB.L achieves a -11.51% return, which is significantly lower than AIAG.L's -5.16% return.
ESGB.L
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -0.88%
- YTD
- -11.51%
- 6M
- -23.37%
- 1Y
- 3.47%
- 3Y*
- 18.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.99%
- 10Y*
- —
AIAG.L
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -2.99%
- YTD
- -5.16%
- 6M
- -5.75%
- 1Y
- 30.89%
- 3Y*
- 20.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ESGB.L vs. AIAG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ESGB.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AIAG.L's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ESGB.L vs. AIAG.L — Risk / Return Rank
ESGB.L
AIAG.L
ESGB.L vs. AIAG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) and L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ESGB.L | AIAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.18 | 1.14 | -0.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 1.62 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.21 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 1.79 | -1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.21 | 4.96 | -4.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ESGB.L | AIAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | 1.14 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.35 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.54 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between ESGB.L and AIAG.L is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ESGB.L vs. AIAG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ESGB.L nor AIAG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ESGB.L vs. AIAG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ESGB.L drawdown since its inception was -39.40%, smaller than the maximum AIAG.L drawdown of -41.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ESGB.L and AIAG.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ESGB.L | AIAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.40% | -41.56% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.63% | -16.80% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.60% | -41.56% | +3.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.37% | -13.05% | -10.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.81% | -12.64% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.14% | 6.07% | +5.07% |
Volatility
ESGB.L vs. AIAG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Vectors Video Gaming and eSports UCITS ETF A USD (ESGB.L) is 6.05%, while L&G Artificial Intelligence UCITS ETF (AIAG.L) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that ESGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIAG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ESGB.L | AIAG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.05% | 7.16% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.78% | 18.64% | -5.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.04% | 27.17% | -8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.23% | 26.28% | -4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 27.40% | -4.46% |