KRMA vs. IQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) and IQM (Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. KRMA is passively managed, while IQM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, KRMA returned 10.89%/yr vs 22.22%/yr for IQM. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KRMA charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for IQM.

Performance

KRMA vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly lower than IQM's 40.18% return.

KRMA

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 6.32%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 6M: 12.13%
• 1Y: 27.87%
• 3Y*: 18.94%
• 5Y*: 10.89%
• 10Y*: —

IQM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 11.94%
• YTD: 40.18%
• 6M: 38.57%
• 1Y: 75.07%
• 3Y*: 37.62%
• 5Y*: 22.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRMA vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF	11.81%	13.98%	18.12%	22.08%	-18.96%	27.71%	25.97%
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	40.18%	30.76%	31.03%	41.06%	-33.36%	25.18%	78.48%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMA and IQM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020	0.78

The correlation between KRMA and IQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KRMA vs. IQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KRMA	IQM
Technology	41.8%	65.9%
Financial Services	11.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	10.8%	4.1%
Communication Services	9.4%	2.1%
Healthcare	8.7%	1.1%
Industrials	7.1%	19.9%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	-
Energy	2.7%	2.7%
Real Estate	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	1.6%	-
Utilities	0.9%	3.3%

Return for Risk

KRMA vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMA

KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 69
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 67
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 73

IQM

IQM Risk / Return Rank: 78
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMA vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KRMA	IQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.67	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	3.11	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.43	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	5.13	-1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.76	16.79	-3.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KRMA vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMA and IQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KRMA	IQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	2.67	-0.40
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.77	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.96	-0.21

Drawdowns

KRMA vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and IQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	KRMA	IQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.16%	-44.91%	+8.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.62%	-14.71%	+6.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.41%	-30.42%	+11.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.12%	-44.91%	+18.79%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-0.37%	-0.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.92%	-12.25%	+7.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	4.49%	-2.46%

Volatility

KRMA vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is 3.12%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that KRMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KRMA	IQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.12%	9.20%	-6.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.34%	22.92%	-13.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.32%	28.27%	-15.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.19%	28.91%	-11.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.51%	30.72%	-12.21%

KRMA vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KRMA vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
IQM Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF	2.32%	2.59%	0.91%	1.16%	0.86%	1.07%	0.96%	1.52%	1.82%	1.21%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KRMA and IQM in my portfolio?

KRMA and IQM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KRMA or IQM?

IQM has higher volatility (9.20%) compared to KRMA (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs IQM's -44.91%.

Which ETF is better, KRMA or IQM?

On 5-year performance, IQM leads with 22.22% vs 10.89% for KRMA. On fees, KRMA is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 3.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KRMA or IQM?

Over the 5-year period, IQM has performed better with a 22.22% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KRMA or IQM?

KRMA is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KRMA or IQM?

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.00% for IQM.

What is the main difference between KRMA and IQM?

They also come from different issuers: Global X and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.50% for IQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.