PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KRMA vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KRMA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.60% return.


KRMA

1D
-0.90%
1M
6.32%
YTD
11.81%
6M
12.13%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
10.89%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.74%
1M
5.12%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.47%
1Y
27.47%
3Y*
22.46%
5Y*
13.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRMA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
11.81%13.98%18.12%22.08%-18.96%27.71%17.53%13.71%
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
10.60%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.53%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMA and BBUS is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019

0.93

The correlation between KRMA and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

KRMA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KRMA
BBUS

Technology

41.8%
37.1%

Financial Services

11.5%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
9.4%

Communication Services

9.4%
10.8%

Healthcare

8.7%
8.1%

Industrials

7.1%
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
4.5%

Energy

2.7%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.6%
1.2%

Utilities

0.9%
2.6%

Technology

KRMA
41.8%
BBUS
37.1%

Financial Services

KRMA
11.5%
BBUS
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

KRMA
10.8%
BBUS
9.4%

Communication Services

KRMA
9.4%
BBUS
10.8%

Healthcare

KRMA
8.7%
BBUS
8.1%

Industrials

KRMA
7.1%
BBUS
7.2%

Consumer Defensive

KRMA
3.5%
BBUS
4.5%

Energy

KRMA
2.7%
BBUS
3.2%

Real Estate

KRMA
1.9%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

KRMA
1.6%
BBUS
1.2%

Utilities

KRMA
0.9%
BBUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KRMA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMA
KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KRMABBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

3.00

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.76

13.76

0.00

KRMA vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMA Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMA and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KRMABBUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.28

2.33

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.79

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.84

-0.08

Drawdowns

KRMA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRMABBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.16%

-35.35%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.62%

-9.21%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.41%

-19.01%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.12%

-25.46%

-0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.74%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-5.46%

+0.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.03%

2.00%

+0.03%

Volatility

KRMA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that KRMA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRMABBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.12%

2.88%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

8.96%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.32%

11.87%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.19%

17.03%

+0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.51%

19.59%

-1.08%

KRMA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

KRMA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than BBUS's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BBUS
JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KRMA
Global X Conscious Companies ETF
2.32%2.59%0.91%1.16%0.86%1.07%0.96%1.52%1.82%1.21%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, KRMA and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

KRMA has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 10.89% for KRMA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for KRMA.

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.98% for BBUS.

KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.02% for BBUS.

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KRMA and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer