KRMA vs. BBUS

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

KRMA (Global X Conscious Companies ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KRMA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while BBUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KRMA returned 9.64%/yr vs 12.46%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KRMA charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.

Performance

KRMA vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRMA achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 7.66% return.

KRMA

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -2.92%
• YTD: 6.73%
• 6M: 5.44%
• 1Y: 19.42%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: 9.64%
• 10Y*: —

BBUS

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: -2.04%
• YTD: 7.66%
• 6M: 6.35%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: 20.89%
• 5Y*: 12.46%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KRMA vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF	6.73%	13.98%	18.12%	22.08%	-18.96%	27.71%	17.53%	14.85%
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF	7.66%	17.77%	24.89%	27.20%	-19.46%	27.13%	20.69%	16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between KRMA and BBUS is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019	0.93

The correlation between KRMA and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

KRMA vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KRMA	BBUS
Technology	41.9%	38.1%
Financial Services	11.9%	11.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	9.1%
Communication Services	8.9%	10.0%
Healthcare	8.7%	8.0%
Industrials	7.1%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.5%	4.4%
Energy	2.6%	3.0%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.7%
Basic Materials	1.6%	1.2%
Utilities	1.0%	2.6%

Return for Risk

KRMA vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRMA

KRMA Risk / Return Rank: 50
KRMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
KRMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
KRMA Omega Ratio Rank: 46
KRMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
KRMA Martin Ratio Rank: 56

BBUS

BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 59
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KRMA vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KRMA	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	1.73	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.37	-0.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.31	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	2.34	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.69	10.25	-1.56

KRMA vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KRMA Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRMA and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KRMA vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRMA drawdown since its inception was -36.16%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRMA and BBUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	KRMA	BBUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.16%	-35.35%	-0.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.62%	-9.21%	+0.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.41%	-19.01%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.12%	-25.46%	-0.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.52%	-3.39%	-2.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.91%	-5.43%	+0.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	2.10%	+0.14%

Volatility

KRMA vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Conscious Companies ETF (KRMA) is 4.58%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 4.84%. This indicates that KRMA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KRMA	BBUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	4.84%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.01%	9.86%	+0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.73%	12.48%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.25%	17.13%	+0.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.50%	19.58%	-1.08%

KRMA vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KRMA has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

KRMA vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

KRMA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than BBUS's 1.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF	1.03%	1.07%	1.21%	1.38%	1.57%	1.11%	1.43%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KRMA Global X Conscious Companies ETF	2.43%	2.59%	0.91%	1.16%	0.86%	1.07%	0.96%	1.52%	1.82%	1.21%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KRMA and BBUS in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, KRMA and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, KRMA or BBUS?

BBUS has higher volatility (4.84%) compared to KRMA (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRMA dropped -36.16% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

Which ETF is better, KRMA or BBUS?

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.46% vs 9.64% for KRMA. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, KRMA has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KRMA or BBUS?

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.46% return vs 9.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KRMA or BBUS?

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for KRMA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KRMA or BBUS?

KRMA has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.03% for BBUS.

What is the main difference between KRMA and BBUS?

KRMA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. KRMA tracks Concinnity Conscious Companies Index GTR Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for KRMA and 0.02% for BBUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.