KRBN vs. ICLN
Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN).
KRBN and ICLN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KRBN is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the IHS Markit Global Carbon Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 2020. ICLN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both KRBN and ICLN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KRBN vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KRBN vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF | -14.77% | 23.11% | -13.56% | 8.01% | -12.75% | 107.69% | 22.60% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 11.08% | 47.05% | -25.72% | -20.41% | -5.43% | -24.18% | 95.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRBN achieves a -14.77% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 11.08% return.
KRBN
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- -14.77%
- 6M
- -5.87%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- -3.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.78%
- 10Y*
- —
ICLN
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 15.82%
- 1Y
- 61.77%
- 3Y*
- -1.04%
- 5Y*
- -4.16%
- 10Y*
- 8.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KRBN vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison
KRBN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KRBN vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank
KRBN
ICLN
KRBN vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KRBN | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | 2.38 | -2.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.63 | 3.01 | -2.38 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.38 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 5.60 | -5.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.14 | 15.65 | -14.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KRBN | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | 2.38 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | -0.15 | +0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | -0.12 | +0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between KRBN and ICLN is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KRBN vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison
KRBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, more than ICLN's 1.47% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRBN KraneShares Global Carbon ETF | 2.23% | 1.90% | 7.10% | 7.60% | 22.91% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF | 1.47% | 1.63% | 1.85% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 1.18% | 0.34% | 1.36% | 2.77% | 2.49% | 3.88% | 2.36% |
Drawdowns
KRBN vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRBN drawdown since its inception was -36.42%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -87.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRBN and ICLN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRBN | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.42% | -87.15% | +50.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.98% | -11.22% | -13.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.42% | -57.16% | +20.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.31% | -50.31% | +28.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -66.84% | +50.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 4.01% | +3.83% |
Volatility
KRBN vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares Global Carbon ETF (KRBN) is 7.81%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 10.23%. This indicates that KRBN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KRBN | ICLN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.81% | 10.23% | -2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.60% | 20.47% | -4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.12% | 26.14% | -6.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.49% | 27.16% | +1.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.88% | 27.04% | +1.84% |