PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KR vs. MAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KR vs. MAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Kroger Co. (KR) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than MAR's 30.26% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has underperformed MAR with an annualized return of 8.32%, while MAR has yielded a comparatively higher 21.03% annualized return.


KR

1D
0.92%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
4.64%
6M
3.46%
1Y
0.76%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
13.21%
10Y*
8.32%

MAR

1D
1.42%
1M
14.20%
YTD
30.26%
6M
35.28%
1Y
59.26%
3Y*
31.68%
5Y*
23.91%
10Y*
21.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KR vs. MAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KR
The Kroger Co.
4.64%4.25%36.91%4.99%0.44%45.41%11.90%7.90%2.08%-18.97%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
30.26%12.31%24.92%53.06%-9.34%25.26%-12.53%41.49%-19.05%66.24%

Correlation

The correlation between KR and MAR is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 1993

0.21

The correlation between KR and MAR shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

KR:

$1.20

MAR:

$12.66

PE Ratio

KR:

54.13

MAR:

31.80

PEG Ratio

KR:

7.85

MAR:

0.83

PS Ratio

KR:

0.29

MAR:

3.78

Total Revenue (TTM)

KR:

$147.23B

MAR:

$21.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KR:

$33.42B

MAR:

$1.31B

EBITDA (TTM)

KR:

$5.29B

MAR:

$3.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KR vs. MAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KR
KR Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
KR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
KR Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
KR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
KR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

MAR
MAR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KR vs. MAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and Marriott International, Inc. (MAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KRMARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.35

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

4.31

-4.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.15

10.89

-10.74

KR vs. MAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KR Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the MAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KR and MAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KR vs. MAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, smaller than the maximum MAR drawdown of -75.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and MAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KRMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.81%

-75.59%

+8.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.44%

-12.65%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-30.50%

+11.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.07%

-30.50%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.25%

-61.26%

+15.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.95%

0.00%

-13.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.44%

-14.90%

-7.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.13%

5.01%

+5.12%

Volatility

KR vs. MAR - Volatility Comparison

The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Marriott International, Inc. (MAR) at 6.92%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KRMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.04%

6.92%

+2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.04%

19.94%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.54%

26.32%

+1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.85%

28.84%

-1.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.94%

32.90%

-3.96%

Dividends

KR vs. MAR - Dividend Comparison

KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than MAR's 0.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KR
The Kroger Co.
2.16%2.14%2.00%2.41%2.11%1.72%2.14%2.07%1.93%1.79%1.30%0.94%
MAR
Marriott International, Inc.
0.68%0.85%0.86%0.87%0.67%0.00%0.36%1.22%1.44%0.95%1.39%1.42%

Financials

KR vs. MAR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and Marriott International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
33.86B
1.81B
(KR) Total Revenue
(MAR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KR and MAR have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KR has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to MAR (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs MAR's -75.59%.

MAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KR and MAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer