KR vs. CL
KR (The Kroger Co.) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KR in Grocery Stores, CL in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, KR returned 8.32%/yr vs 4.62%/yr for CL. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KR vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KR achieves a 4.64% return, which is significantly lower than CL's 14.60% return. Over the past 10 years, KR has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 8.32%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.62% annualized return.
KR
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- 4.64%
- 6M
- 3.46%
- 1Y
- 1.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 13.21%
- 10Y*
- 8.32%
CL
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 15.59%
- 1Y
- -1.53%
- 3Y*
- 8.47%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.62%
KR vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KR The Kroger Co. | 4.64% | 4.25% | 36.91% | 4.99% | 0.44% | 45.41% | 11.90% | 7.90% | 2.08% | -18.97% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 14.60% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between KR and CL is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1977 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
KR:
$1.20
CL:
$2.58
KR:
54.13
CL:
34.68
KR:
7.85
CL:
8.96
KR:
0.29
CL:
3.48
KR:
$147.23B
CL:
$20.80B
KR:
$33.42B
CL:
$12.49B
KR:
$5.29B
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KR vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
KR
CL
KR vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Kroger Co. (KR) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KR | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.01 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.08 | -0.08 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.15 | -0.14 | +0.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KR vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KR drawdown since its inception was -66.81%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KR and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KR | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.81% | -58.91% | -7.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.44% | -18.64% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -29.05% | +9.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.07% | -29.05% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.25% | -29.05% | -17.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.95% | -14.31% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.44% | -11.24% | -11.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.13% | 11.35% | -1.22% |
Volatility
KR vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
The Kroger Co. (KR) has a higher volatility of 9.04% compared to Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) at 8.32%. This indicates that KR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KR | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.04% | 8.32% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.04% | 17.28% | +2.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.54% | 21.83% | +5.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 18.81% | +8.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.94% | 19.75% | +9.19% |
Dividends
KR vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
KR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, less than CL's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.34% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
KR The Kroger Co. | 2.16% | 2.14% | 2.00% | 2.41% | 2.11% | 1.72% | 2.14% | 2.07% | 1.93% | 1.79% | 1.30% | 0.94% |
Financials
KR vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Kroger Co. and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KR vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
KR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a gross profit of 7.12B and revenue of 33.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.0%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
KR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported an operating income of -1.54B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in an operating margin of -4.6%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
KR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Kroger Co. reported a net income of -1.32B and revenue of 33.86B, resulting in a net margin of -3.9%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KR and CL have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KR has higher volatility (9.04%) compared to CL (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KR dropped -66.81% vs CL's -58.91%.
KR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.06 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KR and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer