KOMP vs. IMCG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG).

KOMP and IMCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KOMP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Kensho New Economies Composite Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2018. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. Both KOMP and IMCG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

KOMP vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KOMP vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	-1.97%	19.74%	10.05%	20.09%	-32.21%	3.67%	61.28%	37.12%	-10.32%
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	-1.19%	6.55%	18.14%	20.73%	-25.79%	15.39%	45.64%	35.70%	-8.21%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOMP achieves a -1.97% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's -1.19% return.

KOMP

• 1D: 4.39%
• 1M: -5.96%
• YTD: -1.97%
• 6M: -4.84%
• 1Y: 28.03%
• 3Y*: 12.63%
• 5Y*: -1.70%
• 10Y*: —

IMCG

• 1D: 3.63%
• 1M: -6.39%
• YTD: -1.19%
• 6M: -4.39%
• 1Y: 11.14%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOMP vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOMP has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

KOMP

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF

IMCG

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

KOMP vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOMP

KOMP Risk / Return Rank: 63
KOMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
KOMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
KOMP Omega Ratio Rank: 58
KOMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
KOMP Martin Ratio Rank: 58

IMCG

IMCG Risk / Return Rank: 35
IMCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
IMCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
IMCG Omega Ratio Rank: 33
IMCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
IMCG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOMP vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KOMP	IMCG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	0.55	+0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	0.92	+0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.12	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	0.87	+0.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.44	3.61	+1.82
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KOMP vs. IMCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the IMCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOMP and IMCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KOMP	IMCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	0.55	+0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.25	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.50	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between KOMP and IMCG is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

KOMP vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison

KOMP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, more than IMCG's 0.80% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KOMP SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF	1.81%	1.84%	1.04%	1.27%	1.47%	1.44%	0.69%	0.81%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.80%	0.78%	0.78%	0.85%	0.91%	0.41%	0.09%	0.30%	0.35%	0.45%	0.52%	0.38%

Drawdowns

KOMP vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOMP drawdown since its inception was -50.06%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOMP and IMCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOMP	IMCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.06%	-58.96%	+8.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.50%	-12.99%	-2.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-45.83%	-35.08%	-10.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.88%	-6.90%	-9.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.07%	-9.29%	-12.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.96%	3.14%	+1.82%

Volatility

KOMP vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP) has a higher volatility of 9.41% compared to iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) at 7.19%. This indicates that KOMP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOMP	IMCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.41%	7.19%	+2.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.00%	12.08%	+6.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.45%	20.27%	+6.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.86%	20.09%	+4.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.09%	20.44%	+6.65%