KOKU vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

KOKU (Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. KOKU is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KOKU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

KOKU vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOKU achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 57.26% return.

KOKU

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: 7.89%
• 6M: 7.10%
• 1Y: 22.27%
• 3Y*: 19.94%
• 5Y*: 11.64%
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -6.25%
• 1M: -10.39%
• YTD: 57.26%
• 6M: 44.66%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOKU vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF	7.89%	2.68%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	57.26%	-38.00%

Correlation

The correlation between KOKU and MEME is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.59

KOKU vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KOKU	MEME
Technology	31.8%	66.7%
Financial Services	14.9%	5.5%
Industrials	10.1%	22.3%
Consumer Cyclical	9.0%	-
Communication Services	8.9%	5.5%
Healthcare	8.8%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	-
Energy	4.0%	4.8%
Basic Materials	3.3%	4.6%
Utilities	2.6%	4.9%
Real Estate	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

KOKU vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOKU

KOKU Risk / Return Rank: 57
KOKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
KOKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
KOKU Omega Ratio Rank: 55
KOKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
KOKU Martin Ratio Rank: 64

MEME

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOKU vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KOKU	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.88	—	—

Drawdowns

KOKU vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOKU drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOKU and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOKU	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.77%	-48.78%	+23.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-17.37%	+14.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.80%	-28.63%	+23.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KOKU	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.23%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.57%	75.52%	-62.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.51%	75.52%	-59.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	75.52%	-58.68%

KOKU vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOKU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

KOKU vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

KOKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF	1.45%	1.48%	1.63%	1.76%	1.98%	1.89%	0.55%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOKU and MEME in my portfolio?

KOKU and MEME have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KOKU or MEME?

On fees, KOKU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOKU or MEME?

KOKU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOKU or MEME?

KOKU has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between KOKU and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KOKU and 0.69% for MEME.