KOKU vs. EMXC
KOKU (Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF) and EMXC (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KOKU is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the MSCI Kokusai Index (World ex Japan), while EMXC is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KOKU returned 11.65%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for EMXC. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. KOKU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EMXC.
Performance
KOKU vs. EMXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOKU achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than EMXC's 27.50% return.
KOKU
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.81%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 10.22%
- 1Y
- 21.94%
- 3Y*
- 18.77%
- 5Y*
- 11.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.28%
EMXC
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- 6M
- 16.09%
- YTD
- 27.50%
- 1Y
- 50.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.73%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $245.04M | $277.03M | $277.07M | |
| $13.64K | $42.79K | $42.71K |
KOKU vs. EMXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF | 10.22% | 21.45% | 19.45% | 24.23% | -17.83% | 23.84% | 42.72% |
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 27.50% | 35.14% | 2.68% | 18.96% | -19.56% | 8.54% | 55.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOKU and EMXC is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between KOKU and EMXC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOKU vs. EMXC — Risk / Return Rank
KOKU
EMXC
KOKU vs. EMXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KOKU | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 2.74 | -0.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.55 | 9.76 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KOKU vs. EMXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOKU drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, smaller than the maximum EMXC drawdown of -42.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOKU and EMXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOKU | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.77% | -42.81% | +17.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -18.43% | +9.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.73% | -19.12% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.77% | -28.91% | +3.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -13.49% | +13.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.75% | -10.15% | +5.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 5.17% | -3.04% |
Volatility
KOKU vs. EMXC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) is 3.00%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC) has a volatility of 10.83%. This indicates that KOKU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOKU | EMXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 10.83% | -7.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 25.90% | -15.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 27.60% | -14.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.48% | 19.04% | -2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 20.50% | -3.76% |
KOKU vs. EMXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOKU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than EMXC's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
KOKU vs. EMXC - Dividend Comparison
KOKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than EMXC's 2.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXC iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF | 2.09% | 2.82% | 2.69% | 1.83% | 2.85% | 1.78% | 1.45% | 3.25% | 2.63% | 0.99% |
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF | 1.42% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 0.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KOKU and EMXC have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXC has higher volatility (10.83%) compared to KOKU (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOKU dropped -25.77% vs EMXC's -42.81%.
On 5-year performance, KOKU leads with 11.65% vs 11.22% for EMXC. On fees, KOKU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, KOKU has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KOKU has performed better with a 11.65% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KOKU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.09%, compared with 1.42% for KOKU.
KOKU is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EMXC is Emerging Markets Equities. KOKU tracks MSCI Kokusai Index (World ex Japan), while EMXC tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KOKU and 0.49% for EMXC.
EMXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KOKU and EMXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer