KOKU vs. GQGU
KOKU (Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF) and GQGU (GQG US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. KOKU is passively managed, while GQGU is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. KOKU charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for GQGU.
Performance
KOKU vs. GQGU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KOKU achieves a 7.89% return, which is significantly higher than GQGU's 4.84% return.
KOKU
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 7.89%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.64%
- 10Y*
- —
GQGU
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 4.93%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KOKU vs. GQGU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF | 7.89% | 9.30% |
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 4.84% | -1.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between KOKU and GQGU is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KOKU vs. GQGU — Risk / Return Rank
KOKU
GQGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KOKU vs. GQGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KOKU | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KOKU vs. GQGU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KOKU drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, which is greater than GQGU's maximum drawdown of -8.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOKU and GQGU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KOKU | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.77% | -8.41% | -17.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.45% | -6.23% | +3.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.80% | -2.71% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.05% | — | — |
Volatility
KOKU vs. GQGU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KOKU | GQGU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.57% | 10.54% | +2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 10.54% | +5.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 10.54% | +6.30% |
KOKU vs. GQGU - Expense Ratio Comparison
KOKU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GQGU's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
KOKU vs. GQGU - Dividend Comparison
KOKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than GQGU's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQGU GQG US Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.76% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KOKU and GQGU have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KOKU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KOKU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for GQGU.
KOKU has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.97% for GQGU.
They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and GQG Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KOKU and 0.49% for GQGU.
Find the right allocation for KOKU and GQGU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer