KOKU vs. CCOR

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

KOKU (Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF) and CCOR (Core Alternative ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. KOKU is passively managed, while CCOR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, KOKU returned 11.69%/yr vs -2.14%/yr for CCOR. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KOKU charges 0.09%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for CCOR.

Performance

KOKU vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KOKU achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -1.61% return.

KOKU

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 7.33%
• 6M: 7.81%
• 1Y: 23.41%
• 3Y*: 20.15%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -0.27%
• YTD: -1.61%
• 6M: -2.62%
• 1Y: -3.40%
• 3Y*: -1.43%
• 5Y*: -2.14%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KOKU vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF	7.33%	21.45%	19.45%	24.23%	-17.83%	23.84%	40.42%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-1.61%	3.52%	-5.70%	-11.92%	2.51%	9.90%	-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between KOKU and CCOR is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2020	0.23

The correlation between KOKU and CCOR shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KOKU vs. CCOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KOKU	CCOR
Technology	28.9%	16.2%
Financial Services	15.6%	17.7%
Industrials	10.5%	9.2%
Communication Services	9.3%	8.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	9.4%
Healthcare	8.9%	10.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.4%	6.8%
Energy	4.4%	7.2%
Basic Materials	3.3%	5.1%
Utilities	2.8%	6.3%
Real Estate	1.8%	2.8%

Return for Risk

KOKU vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KOKU

KOKU Risk / Return Rank: 60
KOKU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
KOKU Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
KOKU Omega Ratio Rank: 59
KOKU Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
KOKU Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 5
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KOKU vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KOKU	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	-0.48	+2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.62	-0.63	+3.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	0.93	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	-0.39	+2.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.67	-0.89	+12.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KOKU vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KOKU Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KOKU and CCOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KOKU	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.89	-0.48	+2.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	-0.19	+0.91
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	0.14	+0.93

Drawdowns

KOKU vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KOKU drawdown since its inception was -25.77%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KOKU and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	KOKU	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.77%	-22.99%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.04%	-8.75%	-0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.73%	-12.31%	-5.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.77%	-22.99%	-2.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-18.28%	+15.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.82%	-7.30%	+2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	3.82%	-1.81%

Volatility

KOKU vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF (KOKU) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.43%. This indicates that KOKU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KOKU	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.06%	2.43%	+1.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.84%	5.19%	+4.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.49%	7.10%	+5.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.45%	11.11%	+5.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	10.75%	+6.09%

KOKU vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

KOKU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

KOKU vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

KOKU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than CCOR's 1.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.09%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%
KOKU Xtrackers MSCI Kokusai Equity ETF	1.39%	1.48%	1.63%	1.76%	1.98%	1.89%	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KOKU and CCOR in my portfolio?

KOKU and CCOR have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KOKU or CCOR?

KOKU has higher volatility (4.06%) compared to CCOR (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KOKU dropped -25.77% vs CCOR's -22.99%.

Which ETF is better, KOKU or CCOR?

On 5-year performance, KOKU leads with 11.69% vs -2.14% for CCOR. On fees, KOKU is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, CCOR has been the lower-risk option at 2.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KOKU or CCOR?

Over the 5-year period, KOKU has performed better with a 11.69% return vs -2.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KOKU or CCOR?

KOKU is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KOKU or CCOR?

KOKU has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 1.09% for CCOR.

What is the main difference between KOKU and CCOR?

They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Core Alternative Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for KOKU and 1.09% for CCOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KOKU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.