KO vs. CL
KO (The Coca-Cola Company) and CL (Colgate-Palmolive Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KO in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic, CL in Household & Personal Products. Over the past 10 years, KO returned 9.11%/yr vs 4.14%/yr for CL. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KO vs. CL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KO achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly higher than CL's 8.73% return. Over the past 10 years, KO has outperformed CL with an annualized return of 9.11%, while CL has yielded a comparatively lower 4.14% annualized return.
KO
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 6M
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 12.09%
- 5Y*
- 10.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
CL
- 1D
- -3.85%
- 1M
- -0.59%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- -3.98%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- 2.62%
- 10Y*
- 4.14%
KO vs. CL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 13.43% | 15.60% | 8.88% | -4.43% | 10.61% | 11.37% | 2.47% | 20.60% | 6.77% | 14.38% |
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 8.73% | -10.98% | 16.57% | 3.78% | -5.44% | 2.08% | 27.17% | 18.60% | -19.19% | 17.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between KO and CL is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1977 | 0.42 |
The correlation between KO and CL shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KO:
$339.77B
CL:
$68.33B
KO:
$3.18
CL:
$2.58
KO:
24.80
CL:
32.90
KO:
2.99
CL:
8.50
KO:
6.89
CL:
3.30
KO:
10.10
CL:
471.23
KO:
$49.28B
CL:
$20.80B
KO:
$30.43B
CL:
$12.49B
KO:
$18.35B
CL:
$3.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KO vs. CL — Risk / Return Rank
KO
CL
KO vs. CL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KO | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | -0.19 | +1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.45 | -0.13 | +1.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.99 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | -0.21 | +1.98 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.48 | -0.36 | +3.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KO | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | -0.19 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.14 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.21 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.42 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
KO vs. CL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KO drawdown since its inception was -68.23%, which is greater than CL's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KO and CL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KO | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.23% | -58.91% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -18.64% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -29.05% | +12.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.27% | -29.05% | +11.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.99% | -29.05% | -7.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.86% | -18.69% | +14.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.09% | -11.24% | -4.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 11.21% | -7.21% |
Volatility
KO vs. CL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is 4.16%, while Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL) has a volatility of 6.45%. This indicates that KO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KO | CL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 6.45% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.79% | 16.66% | -4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.86% | 21.10% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.00% | 18.64% | -2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.16% | 19.67% | -1.51% |
Dividends
KO vs. CL - Dividend Comparison
KO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than CL's 2.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CL Colgate-Palmolive Company | 2.46% | 2.61% | 2.18% | 2.40% | 2.36% | 2.10% | 2.05% | 2.48% | 2.79% | 2.11% | 2.37% | 2.25% |
KO The Coca-Cola Company | 2.62% | 2.92% | 3.12% | 3.12% | 2.77% | 2.84% | 2.99% | 2.89% | 3.29% | 3.23% | 3.38% | 3.07% |
Financials
KO vs. CL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between The Coca-Cola Company and Colgate-Palmolive Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KO vs. CL - Profitability Comparison
KO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a gross profit of 7.85B and revenue of 12.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.0%.
CL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a gross profit of 3.23B and revenue of 5.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
KO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported an operating income of 4.36B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
CL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported an operating income of 1.16B and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.7%.
KO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Coca-Cola Company reported a net income of 3.92B and revenue of 12.47B, resulting in a net margin of 31.5%.
CL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Colgate-Palmolive Company reported a net income of 646.00M and revenue of 5.32B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KO and CL have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CL has higher volatility (6.45%) compared to KO (4.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KO dropped -68.23% vs CL's -58.91%.
KO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KO and CL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer