PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNG vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

KNG vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

KNG vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
1.22%6.63%5.99%1.40%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
23.45%6.90%6.11%-8.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNG achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 23.45% return.


KNG

1D
-0.02%
1M
-6.54%
YTD
1.22%
6M
3.22%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*

XOMO

1D
-4.29%
1M
2.32%
YTD
23.45%
6M
31.32%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


KNG vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

KNG vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNG vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNGXOMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.38

1.02

-0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.64

1.40

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.20

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

1.47

-1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.70

3.35

-1.65

KNG vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNG and XOMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNGXOMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

1.02

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.55

-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between KNG and XOMO is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

KNG vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, less than XOMO's 30.57% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
30.57%31.64%26.94%5.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

KNG vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNG drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNG and XOMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.12%

-18.90%

-16.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.55%

-15.24%

+4.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-5.12%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-7.05%

+2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

6.69%

-3.75%

Volatility

KNG vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) is 3.36%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that KNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


KNGXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

6.57%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

13.81%

-6.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.64%

22.02%

-8.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.63%

18.46%

-4.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

18.46%

-1.16%