KNG vs. SCDL
Compare and contrast key facts about FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL).
KNG and SCDL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KNG is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. It was launched on Mar 26, 2018. SCDL is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (200%). It was launched on Feb 4, 2021. Both KNG and SCDL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KNG vs. SCDL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KNG vs. SCDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 1.24% | 6.63% | 5.99% | 7.48% | -7.03% | 23.17% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 24.46% | 2.05% | 14.99% | 0.18% | -13.06% | 52.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNG achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly lower than SCDL's 24.46% return.
KNG
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -6.77%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- 3.06%
- 1Y
- 5.02%
- 3Y*
- 6.53%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- —
SCDL
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -5.08%
- YTD
- 24.46%
- 6M
- 26.60%
- 1Y
- 20.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 9.62%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KNG vs. SCDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SCDL's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KNG vs. SCDL — Risk / Return Rank
KNG
SCDL
KNG vs. SCDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KNG | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.64 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | 1.09 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.16 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.58 | 0.92 | -0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.11 | 2.80 | -0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNG | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.64 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.33 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between KNG and SCDL is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
KNG vs. SCDL - Dividend Comparison
KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, while SCDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNG FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF | 8.67% | 8.61% | 9.08% | 5.91% | 4.00% | 3.45% | 3.62% | 4.09% | 3.46% |
SCDL ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KNG vs. SCDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNG drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, roughly equal to the maximum SCDL drawdown of -34.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNG and SCDL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNG | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.12% | -34.87% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.55% | -25.74% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.20% | -34.87% | +16.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -5.81% | -0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.09% | -12.26% | +8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 8.61% | -5.70% |
Volatility
KNG vs. SCDL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) is 3.41%, while ETRACS 2x Leveraged U.S. Dividend Factor TR ETN (SCDL) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that KNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KNG | SCDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.41% | 4.69% | -1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.48% | 15.48% | -8.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.68% | 32.67% | -18.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.63% | 29.06% | -15.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 29.12% | -11.81% |