PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNG vs. ROBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNG vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNG achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than ROBT's 14.22% return.


KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*

ROBT

1D
-1.73%
1M
13.18%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.64%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNG vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
14.22%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-34.94%9.91%46.18%34.28%-11.94%

Correlation

The correlation between KNG and ROBT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between KNG and ROBT has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

KNG vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNG
ROBT

Consumer Defensive

23.5%
1.4%

Industrials

20.3%
20.4%

Financial Services

12.7%
1.6%

Basic Materials

10.2%

-

Healthcare

10.1%
7.4%

Utilities

6.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
6.6%

Real Estate

4.4%

-

Technology

4.3%
57.0%

Energy

3.0%
1.5%

Communication Services

-

4.1%

Consumer Defensive

KNG
23.5%
ROBT
1.4%

Industrials

KNG
20.3%
ROBT
20.4%

Financial Services

KNG
12.7%
ROBT
1.6%

Basic Materials

KNG
10.2%
ROBT

-

Healthcare

KNG
10.1%
ROBT
7.4%

Utilities

KNG
6.1%
ROBT

-

Consumer Cyclical

KNG
5.5%
ROBT
6.6%

Real Estate

KNG
4.4%
ROBT

-

Technology

KNG
4.3%
ROBT
57.0%

Energy

KNG
3.0%
ROBT
1.5%

Communication Services

KNG

-

ROBT
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNG vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNG vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNGROBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

1.42

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

4.09

-1.84

KNG vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNG and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNGROBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

1.32

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.09

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.35

+0.14

Drawdowns

KNG vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNG drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNG and ROBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGROBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.12%

-44.47%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-21.66%

+13.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

-27.68%

+13.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

-43.26%

+25.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.89%

-1.73%

-4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-15.97%

+11.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

7.53%

-4.21%

Volatility

KNG vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) is 2.29%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that KNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGROBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

6.46%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.39%

17.51%

-10.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

23.32%

-13.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.59%

25.18%

-11.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

25.48%

-8.30%

KNG vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNG vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, while ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNG and ROBT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBT has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNG dropped -35.12% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

On 5-year performance, KNG leads with 4.31% vs 2.38% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KNG has performed better with a 4.31% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.

KNG is categorized as Dividend, while ROBT is Technology Equities. KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KNG and 0.65% for ROBT.

ROBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNG and ROBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer