KNGZ vs. NOBL
KNGZ (First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KNGZ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index, while NOBL is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KNGZ returned 9.38%/yr vs 6.18%/yr for NOBL. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KNGZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NOBL.
Performance
KNGZ vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNGZ achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 6.48% return.
KNGZ
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 12.69%
- 1Y
- 25.37%
- 3Y*
- 16.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.38%
- 10Y*
- —
NOBL
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 6.48%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 12.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.50%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
KNGZ vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGZ First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 13.33% | 14.27% | 11.05% | 9.77% | -7.55% | 28.99% | 5.51% | 27.34% | -7.11% | 9.90% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 6.48% | 6.84% | 6.72% | 8.09% | -6.52% | 25.46% | 8.35% | 27.39% | -3.26% | 11.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNGZ and NOBL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017 | 0.72 |
The correlation between KNGZ and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KNGZ vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KNGZ
NOBL
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Utilities
Communication Services
-
Energy
Basic Materials
Financial Services
KNGZ
NOBL
Technology
KNGZ
NOBL
Industrials
KNGZ
NOBL
Consumer Cyclical
KNGZ
NOBL
Healthcare
KNGZ
NOBL
Consumer Defensive
KNGZ
NOBL
Real Estate
KNGZ
NOBL
Utilities
KNGZ
NOBL
Communication Services
KNGZ
NOBL
-
Energy
KNGZ
NOBL
Basic Materials
KNGZ
NOBL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNGZ vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank
KNGZ
NOBL
KNGZ vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KNGZ | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.19 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 1.38 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.91 | 3.50 | +5.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KNGZ vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNGZ drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGZ and NOBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNGZ | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.44% | -35.43% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -9.11% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.70% | -15.36% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.71% | -17.92% | -1.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.86% | -3.29% | -0.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -3.48% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.58% | -0.72% |
Volatility
KNGZ vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that KNGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNGZ | NOBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 3.31% | +1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.19% | 8.22% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.75% | 11.52% | +2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 14.38% | +1.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 16.60% | +2.25% |
KNGZ vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KNGZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
KNGZ vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison
KNGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than NOBL's 2.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNGZ First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.40% | 2.70% | 2.55% | 3.10% | 2.52% | 1.95% | 2.44% | 2.85% | 4.09% | 1.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.06% | 2.14% | 2.05% | 2.09% | 1.94% | 1.89% | 2.14% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 1.74% | 2.13% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KNGZ and NOBL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KNGZ has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNGZ dropped -37.44% vs NOBL's -35.43%.
On 5-year performance, KNGZ leads with 9.38% vs 6.18% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KNGZ has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 6.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KNGZ.
KNGZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 2.06% for NOBL.
KNGZ is categorized as S&P 500, while NOBL is Dividend. KNGZ tracks S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KNGZ and 0.35% for NOBL.
KNGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KNGZ and NOBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer