PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNGZ vs. NOBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNGZ vs. NOBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNGZ achieves a 13.33% return, which is significantly higher than NOBL's 6.48% return.


KNGZ

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
13.33%
6M
12.69%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
16.12%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*

NOBL

1D
0.68%
1M
2.27%
YTD
6.48%
6M
5.98%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
8.50%
5Y*
6.18%
10Y*
9.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNGZ vs. NOBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
13.33%14.27%11.05%9.77%-7.55%28.99%5.51%27.34%-7.11%9.90%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
6.48%6.84%6.72%8.09%-6.52%25.46%8.35%27.39%-3.26%11.82%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGZ and NOBL is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.72

The correlation between KNGZ and NOBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KNGZ vs. NOBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNGZ
NOBL

Financial Services

15.2%
12.8%

Technology

15.2%
4.6%

Industrials

14.1%
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%
5.3%

Healthcare

12.1%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
23.6%

Real Estate

6.1%
4.6%

Utilities

6.1%
5.7%

Communication Services

5.1%

-

Energy

4.0%
2.9%

Basic Materials

3.0%
10.2%

Financial Services

KNGZ
15.2%
NOBL
12.8%

Technology

KNGZ
15.2%
NOBL
4.6%

Industrials

KNGZ
14.1%
NOBL
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

KNGZ
12.1%
NOBL
5.3%

Healthcare

KNGZ
12.1%
NOBL
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

KNGZ
6.1%
NOBL
23.6%

Real Estate

KNGZ
6.1%
NOBL
4.6%

Utilities

KNGZ
6.1%
NOBL
5.7%

Communication Services

KNGZ
5.1%
NOBL

-

Energy

KNGZ
4.0%
NOBL
2.9%

Basic Materials

KNGZ
3.0%
NOBL
10.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNGZ vs. NOBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNGZ
KNGZ Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
KNGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

NOBL
NOBL Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
NOBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOBL Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
NOBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOBL Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNGZ vs. NOBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNGZNOBLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.19

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.38

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.91

3.50

+5.40

KNGZ vs. NOBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNGZ Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is higher than the NOBL Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNGZ and NOBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNGZ vs. NOBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGZ drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, which is greater than NOBL's maximum drawdown of -35.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGZ and NOBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGZNOBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-35.43%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-9.11%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-15.36%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-17.92%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.86%

-3.29%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.85%

-3.48%

-1.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

3.58%

-0.72%

Volatility

KNGZ vs. NOBL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) has a higher volatility of 4.88% compared to ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) at 3.31%. This indicates that KNGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGZNOBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.88%

3.31%

+1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.19%

8.22%

+1.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.75%

11.52%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

14.38%

+1.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

16.60%

+2.25%

KNGZ vs. NOBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNGZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NOBL's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNGZ vs. NOBL - Dividend Comparison

KNGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.40%, more than NOBL's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.40%2.70%2.55%3.10%2.52%1.95%2.44%2.85%4.09%1.10%0.00%0.00%
NOBL
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.06%2.14%2.05%2.09%1.94%1.89%2.14%1.89%2.37%1.74%2.13%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNGZ and NOBL have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNGZ has higher volatility (4.88%) compared to NOBL (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNGZ dropped -37.44% vs NOBL's -35.43%.

On 5-year performance, KNGZ leads with 9.38% vs 6.18% for NOBL. On fees, NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, NOBL has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KNGZ has performed better with a 9.38% return vs 6.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NOBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KNGZ.

KNGZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 2.06% for NOBL.

KNGZ is categorized as S&P 500, while NOBL is Dividend. KNGZ tracks S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index, while NOBL tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KNGZ and 0.35% for NOBL.

KNGZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNGZ and NOBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer