PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNGZ vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNGZ vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNGZ achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 18.21% return.


KNGZ

1D
0.85%
1M
2.20%
6M
9.84%
YTD
16.58%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.31%

RDVY

1D
0.81%
1M
2.01%
6M
12.29%
YTD
18.21%
1Y
31.80%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
16.08%
ALL TIME*
13.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$238.83K$213.53K$206.96K
$79.27M$78.43M$84.11M

KNGZ vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
16.58%14.27%11.05%9.77%-7.55%28.99%5.51%27.34%-7.11%9.90%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
18.21%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%37.71%-9.92%11.99%

Correlation

The correlation between KNGZ and RDVY is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.74

The correlation between KNGZ and RDVY shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (all time) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KNGZ vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNGZ
RDVY

Technology

37.4%
19.4%

Financial Services

13.5%
38.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
11.1%

Healthcare

9.8%
5.6%

Communication Services

9.1%
4.2%

Industrials

7.1%
12.5%

Energy

3.8%
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
2.8%

Utilities

2.7%
1.4%

Real Estate

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.9%

-

Technology

KNGZ
37.4%
RDVY
19.4%

Financial Services

KNGZ
13.5%
RDVY
38.9%

Consumer Cyclical

KNGZ
10.1%
RDVY
11.1%

Healthcare

KNGZ
9.8%
RDVY
5.6%

Communication Services

KNGZ
9.1%
RDVY
4.2%

Industrials

KNGZ
7.1%
RDVY
12.5%

Energy

KNGZ
3.8%
RDVY
2.8%

Consumer Defensive

KNGZ
3.6%
RDVY
2.8%

Utilities

KNGZ
2.7%
RDVY
1.4%

Real Estate

KNGZ
2.0%
RDVY

-

Basic Materials

KNGZ
0.9%
RDVY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNGZ vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KNGZ
KNGZ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
KNGZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNGZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNGZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
KNGZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNGZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KNGZ vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNGZRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.54

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

14.83

-5.39

KNGZ vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNGZ Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNGZ and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNGZ vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNGZ drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNGZ and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGZRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-40.60%

+3.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-9.04%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-19.11%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-25.32%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

0.00%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-4.95%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.15%

+0.79%

Volatility

KNGZ vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF (KNGZ) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.55%. This indicates that KNGZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGZRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

3.55%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

11.40%

-1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.65%

14.64%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

18.93%

-2.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

21.03%

-2.25%

KNGZ vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNGZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNGZ vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

KNGZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than RDVY's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNGZ
First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.50%2.70%2.55%3.10%2.52%1.95%2.44%2.85%4.09%1.10%0.00%0.00%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNGZ and RDVY have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNGZ has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to RDVY (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNGZ dropped -37.44% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 5-year performance, RDVY leads with 13.07% vs 9.76% for KNGZ. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 13.07% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KNGZ.

KNGZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.

KNGZ is categorized as S&P 500, while RDVY is Dividend. KNGZ tracks S&P 500 Sector-Neutral Dividend Aristocrats Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KNGZ and 0.47% for RDVY.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNGZ and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer