PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNG vs. AMDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNG vs. AMDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNG achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than AMDY's 110.49% return.


KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*

AMDY

1D
3.39%
1M
46.76%
YTD
110.49%
6M
111.80%
1Y
240.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNG vs. AMDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%3.27%
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
110.49%53.93%-17.00%26.24%

Correlation

The correlation between KNG and AMDY is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.20

The correlation between KNG and AMDY shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNG vs. AMDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNG vs. AMDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) and YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KNGAMDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.64

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

8.77

-7.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.25

19.77

-17.52

KNG vs. AMDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNG Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the AMDY Sharpe Ratio of 4.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNG and AMDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KNGAMDYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

4.53

-3.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

1.25

-0.76

Drawdowns

KNG vs. AMDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNG drawdown since its inception was -35.12%, smaller than the maximum AMDY drawdown of -53.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNG and AMDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNGAMDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.12%

-53.92%

+18.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

-27.59%

+18.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.89%

0.00%

-5.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.13%

-18.02%

+13.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

12.22%

-8.90%

Volatility

KNG vs. AMDY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) is 2.29%, while YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) has a volatility of 20.81%. This indicates that KNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNGAMDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.29%

20.81%

-18.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.39%

39.99%

-32.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

53.40%

-43.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.59%

46.01%

-32.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.18%

46.01%

-28.83%

KNG vs. AMDY - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNG vs. AMDY - Dividend Comparison

KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.67%, less than AMDY's 54.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
54.91%80.68%109.98%6.68%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNG and AMDY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMDY has higher volatility (20.81%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNG dropped -35.12% vs AMDY's -53.92%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 240.44% vs 7.44% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 240.44% return vs 7.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDY.

AMDY has the higher dividend yield at 54.91%, compared with 8.67% for KNG.

KNG is categorized as Dividend, while AMDY is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for KNG and 0.99% for AMDY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.53 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNG and AMDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer