KNF vs. LQDT
KNF (Knife River Corporation) and LQDT (Liquidity Services, Inc.) are both stocks. KNF operates in Building Materials (Basic Materials), while LQDT operates in Internet Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, KNF returned 26.71%/yr vs 31.43%/yr for LQDT. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KNF vs. LQDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNF achieves a 11.49% return, which is significantly lower than LQDT's 19.76% return.
KNF
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- -15.65%
- YTD
- 11.49%
- 6M
- 5.97%
- 1Y
- -14.48%
- 3Y*
- 26.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDT
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- 1.09%
- YTD
- 19.76%
- 6M
- 23.39%
- 1Y
- 56.53%
- 3Y*
- 31.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.62%
- 10Y*
- 17.81%
KNF vs. LQDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KNF Knife River Corporation | 11.49% | -30.79% | 53.58% | 88.98% |
LQDT Liquidity Services, Inc. | 19.76% | -6.13% | 87.62% | 13.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNF and LQDT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2023 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
KNF:
$4.45B
LQDT:
$1.17B
KNF:
$2.58
LQDT:
$0.93
KNF:
30.42
LQDT:
38.83
KNF:
1.39
LQDT:
2.45
KNF:
2.85
LQDT:
5.28
KNF:
$3.20B
LQDT:
$479.92M
KNF:
$585.88M
LQDT:
$111.22M
KNF:
$441.86M
LQDT:
$52.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNF vs. LQDT — Risk / Return Rank
KNF
LQDT
KNF vs. LQDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Knife River Corporation (KNF) and Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KNF | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | 1.62 | -1.93 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | 2.32 | -2.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.30 | -0.32 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | 2.57 | -3.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.88 | 7.38 | -8.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KNF | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 | 1.62 | -1.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.10 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
KNF vs. LQDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNF drawdown since its inception was -44.15%, smaller than the maximum LQDT drawdown of -95.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNF and LQDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNF | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.15% | -95.31% | +51.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.15% | -21.53% | -15.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.15% | -41.08% | -3.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -57.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.91% | -44.38% | +17.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.74% | -62.23% | +49.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.92% | 7.50% | +11.42% |
Volatility
KNF vs. LQDT - Volatility Comparison
Knife River Corporation (KNF) has a higher volatility of 14.82% compared to Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT) at 9.73%. This indicates that KNF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LQDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNF | LQDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.82% | 9.73% | +5.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.49% | 20.40% | +17.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.33% | 34.99% | +12.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.33% | 45.15% | -2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.33% | 53.11% | -10.78% |
Dividends
KNF vs. LQDT - Dividend Comparison
Neither KNF nor LQDT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
KNF vs. LQDT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Knife River Corporation and Liquidity Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KNF vs. LQDT - Profitability Comparison
KNF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knife River Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.80M and revenue of 410.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -0.7%.
LQDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of -54.45M and revenue of 120.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -45.1%.
KNF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knife River Corporation reported an operating income of -86.30M and revenue of 410.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.
LQDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.62M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.
KNF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Knife River Corporation reported a net income of -79.20M and revenue of 410.10M, resulting in a net margin of -19.3%.
LQDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidity Services, Inc. reported a net income of 7.52M and revenue of 120.73M, resulting in a net margin of 6.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KNF and LQDT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KNF has higher volatility (14.82%) compared to LQDT (9.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNF dropped -44.15% vs LQDT's -95.31%.
LQDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KNF and LQDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer