KNCT vs. IGV
KNCT (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - KNCT tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index while IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KNCT returned 21.11%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for IGV. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KNCT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.
Performance
KNCT vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 54.15% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -17.37% return. Over the past 10 years, KNCT has outperformed IGV with an annualized return of 21.11%, while IGV has yielded a comparatively lower 15.70% annualized return.
KNCT
- 1D
- -5.38%
- 1M
- 5.48%
- YTD
- 54.15%
- 6M
- 54.94%
- 1Y
- 84.85%
- 3Y*
- 40.93%
- 5Y*
- 19.32%
- 10Y*
- 21.11%
IGV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -7.10%
- YTD
- -17.37%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -17.89%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
KNCT vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 54.15% | 28.65% | 19.41% | 27.39% | -29.54% | 21.83% | 39.14% | 26.35% | 5.78% | 15.41% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -17.37% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 12.30% | 52.86% | 34.33% | 12.44% | 42.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between KNCT and IGV is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.79 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KNCT and IGV has dropped to 0.48 - well below their long-term average of 0.79, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
KNCT vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KNCT
IGV
Technology
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
KNCT
IGV
Communication Services
KNCT
IGV
Real Estate
KNCT
IGV
-
Industrials
KNCT
IGV
Financial Services
KNCT
IGV
Basic Materials
KNCT
-
IGV
-
Consumer Cyclical
KNCT
-
IGV
Consumer Defensive
KNCT
-
IGV
-
Energy
KNCT
-
IGV
-
Healthcare
KNCT
-
IGV
-
Utilities
KNCT
-
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KNCT vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
KNCT
IGV
KNCT vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KNCT | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 0.91 | +0.66 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.94 | -0.49 | +7.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.00 | -1.00 | +31.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KNCT vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, smaller than the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KNCT | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.18% | -63.45% | +6.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.30% | -36.61% | +24.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.40% | -36.61% | +15.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.55% | -45.85% | +11.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.55% | -45.85% | +11.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.27% | -25.85% | +19.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.73% | -14.46% | +3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 17.94% | -15.10% |
Volatility
KNCT vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a higher volatility of 15.64% compared to iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) at 12.71%. This indicates that KNCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KNCT | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.64% | 12.71% | +2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.75% | 24.86% | -3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.15% | 28.27% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.96% | 27.97% | -4.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.33% | 26.38% | -3.05% |
KNCT vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
KNCT vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than IGV's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF | 0.62% | 0.86% | 1.38% | 0.60% | 2.24% | 0.55% | 0.18% | 0.44% | 1.22% | 0.66% | 0.44% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KNCT and IGV have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KNCT has higher volatility (15.64%) compared to IGV (12.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 10-year performance, KNCT leads with 21.11% vs 15.70% for IGV. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGV has been the lower-risk option at 12.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KNCT has performed better with a 21.11% return vs 15.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KNCT.
KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.39% for IGV.
KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs -0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KNCT and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer