PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KNCT vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KNCT vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 40.12% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, KNCT has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 18.83%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.06% annualized return.


KNCT

1D
0.08%
1M
-4.96%
6M
31.73%
YTD
40.12%
1Y
63.92%
3Y*
33.13%
5Y*
16.31%
10Y*
18.83%
ALL TIME*
13.22%

VGT

1D
-0.38%
1M
-1.30%
6M
21.30%
YTD
20.36%
1Y
34.81%
3Y*
26.48%
5Y*
17.81%
10Y*
24.06%
ALL TIME*
14.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$741.37K$822.66K$837.91K
$440.89M$515.41M$573.34M

KNCT vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
40.12%28.65%19.41%27.39%-29.54%21.83%39.14%26.35%5.78%15.41%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
20.36%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%30.45%46.04%48.62%2.46%37.08%

Correlation

The correlation between KNCT and VGT is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005

0.82

The correlation between KNCT and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

KNCT vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KNCT
VGT

Technology

86.3%
98.6%

Communication Services

10.0%
0.5%

Real Estate

3.0%

-

Industrials

0.7%
0.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.5%

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

0.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.3%

Healthcare

-

0.0%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

KNCT
86.3%
VGT
98.6%

Communication Services

KNCT
10.0%
VGT
0.5%

Real Estate

KNCT
3.0%
VGT

-

Industrials

KNCT
0.7%
VGT
0.4%

Financial Services

KNCT
0.2%
VGT
0.5%

Basic Materials

KNCT

-

VGT
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

KNCT

-

VGT
0.1%

Consumer Defensive

KNCT

-

VGT

-

Energy

KNCT

-

VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

KNCT

-

VGT
0.0%

Utilities

KNCT

-

VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KNCT vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

KNCT
KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

KNCT vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KNCTVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.23

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

1.94

+1.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.33

5.23

+8.10

KNCT vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNCT Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNCT and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KNCT vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, roughly equal to the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KNCTVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.18%

-54.63%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.91%

-16.40%

-2.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

-27.23%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

-35.07%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

-35.07%

+0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.80%

-9.93%

-4.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-7.95%

-2.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.68%

6.07%

-1.39%

Volatility

KNCT vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.42%. This indicates that KNCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KNCTVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.26%

8.42%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.68%

20.14%

+4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.67%

24.28%

+3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

25.83%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.55%

24.89%

-1.34%

KNCT vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

KNCT vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, more than VGT's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.68%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


KNCT and VGT have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNCT has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to VGT (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.06% vs 18.83% for KNCT. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 8.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.06% return vs 18.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for KNCT.

KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.38% for VGT.

KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.09% for VGT.

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KNCT and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer