KNCT vs. GINN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KNCT (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) and GINN (Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - KNCT tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index while GINN tracks the Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KNCT returned 21.73%/yr vs 6.82%/yr for GINN. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KNCT charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for GINN.

Performance

KNCT vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KNCT achieves a 63.41% return, which is significantly higher than GINN's 8.64% return.

KNCT

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 26.38%
• YTD: 63.41%
• 6M: 62.53%
• 1Y: 99.38%
• 3Y*: 43.36%
• 5Y*: 21.73%
• 10Y*: 21.42%

GINN

• 1D: -1.29%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 8.64%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 25.65%
• 3Y*: 19.95%
• 5Y*: 6.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KNCT vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	63.41%	28.65%	19.41%	27.39%	-29.54%	21.83%	16.64%
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	8.64%	20.25%	18.71%	29.94%	-32.40%	10.39%	9.84%

Correlation

The correlation between KNCT and GINN is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2020	0.84

The correlation between KNCT and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

KNCT vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KNCT	GINN
Technology	80.8%	32.4%
Communication Services	14.0%	10.8%
Real Estate	4.1%	0.8%
Industrials	1.1%	6.1%
Financial Services	0.2%	11.4%
Basic Materials	-	0.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	14.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.0%
Energy	-	1.4%
Healthcare	-	18.6%
Utilities	-	1.9%

Return for Risk

KNCT vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KNCT

KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 96
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 95
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 97

GINN

GINN Risk / Return Rank: 44
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 43
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KNCT vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KNCT	GINN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	4.70	1.61	+3.09
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.72	2.25	+3.46
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.28	+0.48
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	10.00	1.95	+8.05
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	44.01	7.06	+36.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KNCT vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KNCT Sharpe Ratio is 4.70, which is higher than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KNCT and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KNCT	GINN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.70	1.61	+3.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.32	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.45	+0.13

Drawdowns

KNCT vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KNCT drawdown since its inception was -57.18%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KNCT and GINN.

Drawdown Indicators

	KNCT	GINN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.18%	-41.25%	-15.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.99%	-13.18%	+3.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.40%	-22.25%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.55%	-41.25%	+6.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-1.63%	+1.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.74%	-13.37%	+2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.27%	3.64%	-1.37%

Volatility

KNCT vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a higher volatility of 9.19% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 3.98%. This indicates that KNCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KNCT	GINN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.19%	3.98%	+5.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.12%	12.04%	+5.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.28%	16.06%	+5.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.19%	21.33%	+1.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.97%	21.05%	+1.92%

KNCT vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KNCT has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KNCT vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, less than GINN's 1.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GINN Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF	1.16%	1.26%	1.26%	1.01%	0.69%	0.67%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KNCT Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	0.57%	0.86%	1.38%	0.60%	2.24%	0.55%	0.18%	0.44%	1.22%	0.66%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KNCT and GINN in my portfolio?

KNCT and GINN have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KNCT or GINN?

KNCT has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to GINN (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KNCT dropped -57.18% vs GINN's -41.25%.

Which ETF is better, KNCT or GINN?

On 5-year performance, KNCT leads with 21.73% vs 6.82% for GINN. On fees, KNCT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KNCT or GINN?

Over the 5-year period, KNCT has performed better with a 21.73% return vs 6.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KNCT or GINN?

KNCT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for GINN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KNCT or GINN?

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.16%, compared with 0.57% for KNCT.

What is the main difference between KNCT and GINN?

KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for KNCT and 0.50% for GINN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.70 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.