PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KMLI vs. KARS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KMLI vs. KARS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KMLI achieves a -44.90% return, which is significantly lower than KARS's 1.34% return.


KMLI

1D
-5.19%
1M
-5.53%
YTD
-44.90%
6M
-44.26%
1Y
-70.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KARS

1D
-2.26%
1M
-14.17%
YTD
1.34%
6M
0.16%
1Y
40.75%
3Y*
1.63%
5Y*
-5.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KMLI vs. KARS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between KMLI and KARS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025

0.21

KMLI vs. KARS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KMLI
KARS

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
33.5%

Basic Materials

-

25.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

22.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

19.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

KMLI
100.0%
KARS
33.5%

Basic Materials

KMLI

-

KARS
25.4%

Communication Services

KMLI

-

KARS

-

Consumer Defensive

KMLI

-

KARS

-

Energy

KMLI

-

KARS

-

Financial Services

KMLI

-

KARS

-

Healthcare

KMLI

-

KARS

-

Industrials

KMLI

-

KARS
22.1%

Real Estate

KMLI

-

KARS

-

Technology

KMLI

-

KARS
19.0%

Utilities

KMLI

-

KARS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KMLI vs. KARS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KMLI
KMLI Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
KMLI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLI Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLI Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLI Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLI Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

KARS
KARS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
KARS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KARS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
KARS Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
KARS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
KARS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KMLI vs. KARS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) and KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KMLIKARSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.82

1.26

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.96

2.20

-3.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

8.55

-10.01

KMLI vs. KARS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KMLI Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the KARS Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KMLI and KARS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KMLI vs. KARS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KMLI drawdown since its inception was -73.23%, which is greater than KARS's maximum drawdown of -64.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMLI and KARS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KMLIKARSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.23%

-64.85%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-73.23%

-18.57%

-54.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-71.64%

-38.23%

-33.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-28.34%

-14.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

48.16%

4.78%

+43.38%

Volatility

KMLI vs. KARS - Volatility Comparison

KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF (KMLI) has a higher volatility of 21.21% compared to KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF (KARS) at 11.50%. This indicates that KMLI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KARS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KMLIKARSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.21%

11.50%

+9.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.96%

21.38%

+40.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.30%

27.77%

+51.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

78.90%

30.11%

+48.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

78.90%

29.41%

+49.49%

KMLI vs. KARS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KMLI has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than KARS's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

KMLI vs. KARS - Dividend Comparison

KMLI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.29%, more than KARS's 0.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF
0.18%0.18%0.78%0.88%1.13%6.73%0.14%1.85%1.38%
KMLI
KraneShares 2x Long MELI Daily ETF
19.29%10.63%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KMLI and KARS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KMLI has higher volatility (21.21%) compared to KARS (11.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMLI dropped -73.23% vs KARS's -64.85%.

On 1-year performance, KARS leads with 40.75% vs -70.09% for KMLI. On fees, KARS is cheaper at 0.72% per year. On volatility, KARS has been the lower-risk option at 11.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KARS has performed better with a 40.75% return vs -70.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KARS is cheaper with a 0.72% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KMLI.

KMLI has the higher dividend yield at 19.29%, compared with 0.18% for KARS.

KMLI is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while KARS is Industrials Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KMLI and 0.72% for KARS.

KARS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KMLI and KARS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer