KMB vs. USD
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) is a stock, while USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 1.38%/yr vs 56.23%/yr for USD. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 63.25% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed USD with an annualized return of 1.38%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 56.23% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 2.31%
- 1M
- 4.52%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 1Y
- -10.42%
- 3Y*
- -2.94%
- 5Y*
- -0.96%
- 10Y*
- 1.38%
USD
- 1D
- -7.37%
- 1M
- -12.52%
- 6M
- 51.62%
- YTD
- 63.25%
- 1Y
- 108.17%
- 3Y*
- 94.08%
- 5Y*
- 61.69%
- 10Y*
- 56.23%
KMB vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 10.87% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 63.25% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and USD is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | 0.19 |
The correlation between KMB and USD shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
USD
KMB vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.26 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 3.42 | -3.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.52 | 8.81 | -9.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum USD drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -88.63% | +51.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -31.80% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -64.46% | +30.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -77.85% | +43.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -77.85% | +43.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.71% | -24.58% | +2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -32.25% | +23.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.04% | 12.32% | +7.72% |
Volatility
KMB vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 9.46%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 30.75%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.46% | 30.75% | -21.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.55% | 58.47% | -39.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.96% | 71.05% | -44.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 78.28% | -57.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 70.10% | -48.88% |
Dividends
KMB vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, more than USD's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.66% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.35% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and USD have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (30.75%) compared to KMB (9.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs USD's -88.63%.
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer