KMB vs. SYK
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and SYK (Stryker Corporation) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while SYK operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.95%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for SYK. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. SYK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly higher than SYK's -10.93% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed SYK with an annualized return of 0.95%, while SYK has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -19.86%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
SYK
- 1D
- 2.15%
- 1M
- 3.35%
- YTD
- -10.93%
- 6M
- -11.37%
- 1Y
- -17.16%
- 3Y*
- 4.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 11.70%
KMB vs. SYK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
SYK Stryker Corporation | -10.93% | -1.48% | 21.34% | 23.80% | -7.42% | 10.22% | 18.17% | 35.33% | 2.43% | 30.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and SYK is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 1988 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$34.08B
SYK:
$120.67B
KMB:
$5.93
SYK:
$8.63
KMB:
17.26
SYK:
36.16
KMB:
2.98
SYK:
2.68
KMB:
2.06
SYK:
4.78
KMB:
18.98
SYK:
2.61
KMB:
$16.54B
SYK:
$25.27B
KMB:
$5.93B
SYK:
$16.09B
KMB:
$3.07B
SYK:
$5.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. SYK — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
SYK
KMB vs. SYK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Stryker Corporation (SYK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | SYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 0.89 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | -0.58 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | -1.38 | +0.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. SYK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum SYK drawdown of -58.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and SYK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | SYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -58.63% | +21.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -29.45% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -29.45% | -4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -31.68% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -43.80% | +9.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -22.05% | -4.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -13.11% | +4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 12.49% | +6.94% |
Volatility
KMB vs. SYK - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Stryker Corporation (SYK) have volatilities of 8.42% and 8.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | SYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 8.24% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 18.39% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 22.78% | +2.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 24.24% | -4.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 26.35% | -5.28% |
Dividends
KMB vs. SYK - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than SYK's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
SYK Stryker Corporation | 1.10% | 0.97% | 0.90% | 1.02% | 1.16% | 0.97% | 0.96% | 1.02% | 1.23% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.52% |
Financials
KMB vs. SYK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Stryker Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. SYK - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
SYK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stryker Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.81B and revenue of 6.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.3%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
SYK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stryker Corporation reported an operating income of 936.00M and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
SYK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stryker Corporation reported a net income of 745.00M and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and SYK have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to SYK (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs SYK's -58.63%.
SYK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.76 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and SYK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer