PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYK vs. SNN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SYK vs. SNN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stryker Corporation (SYK) and Smith & Nephew plc (SNN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYK achieves a -15.84% return, which is significantly lower than SNN's -7.39% return. Over the past 10 years, SYK has outperformed SNN with an annualized return of 11.25%, while SNN has yielded a comparatively lower 0.76% annualized return.


SYK

1D
0.58%
1M
1.42%
YTD
-15.84%
6M
-18.97%
1Y
-21.83%
3Y*
2.95%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
11.25%

SNN

1D
1.94%
1M
-3.14%
YTD
-7.39%
6M
-7.82%
1Y
5.21%
3Y*
2.35%
5Y*
-4.25%
10Y*
0.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYK vs. SNN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYK
Stryker Corporation
-15.84%-1.48%21.34%23.80%-7.42%10.22%18.17%35.33%2.43%30.84%
SNN
Smith & Nephew plc
-7.39%36.82%-7.34%4.44%-20.20%-16.21%-10.40%30.84%8.90%18.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SYK and SNN is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 1999

0.39

The correlation between SYK and SNN shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (all time) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SYK:

$114.02B

SNN:

$13.06B

EPS

SYK:

$8.63

SNN:

$2.37

PE Ratio

SYK:

34.17

SNN:

12.63

PEG Ratio

SYK:

2.54

SNN:

0.44

PS Ratio

SYK:

4.51

SNN:

1.09

PB Ratio

SYK:

2.46

SNN:

2.47

Total Revenue (TTM)

SYK:

$25.27B

SNN:

$11.99B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SYK:

$16.09B

SNN:

$8.25B

EBITDA (TTM)

SYK:

$5.48B

SNN:

$2.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYK vs. SNN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYK
SYK Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
SYK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYK Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYK Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SYK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYK Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SNN
SNN Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SNN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SNN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SNN Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
SNN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
SNN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYK vs. SNN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stryker Corporation (SYK) and Smith & Nephew plc (SNN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYKSNNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.99

0.18

-1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.35

0.47

-1.82

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

1.06

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

0.23

-0.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.84

0.47

-2.31

SYK vs. SNN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYK Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is lower than the SNN Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYK and SNN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYKSNNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

0.18

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

-0.16

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.03

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.28

+0.28

Drawdowns

SYK vs. SNN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYK drawdown since its inception was -58.63%, which is greater than SNN's maximum drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYK and SNN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYKSNNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.63%

-55.20%

-3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.45%

-23.03%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.45%

-32.36%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.68%

-49.18%

+17.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.80%

-55.06%

+11.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.35%

-31.62%

+5.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.10%

-17.64%

+4.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.88%

11.20%

+0.68%

Volatility

SYK vs. SNN - Volatility Comparison

Stryker Corporation (SYK) has a higher volatility of 8.52% compared to Smith & Nephew plc (SNN) at 7.37%. This indicates that SYK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYKSNNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.52%

7.37%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.78%

17.54%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.04%

29.55%

-7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.13%

27.08%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.30%

26.91%

-0.61%

Dividends

SYK vs. SNN - Dividend Comparison

SYK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than SNN's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SNN
Smith & Nephew plc
2.61%2.32%3.05%2.75%2.79%2.17%1.78%1.51%1.96%1.76%2.08%1.68%
SYK
Stryker Corporation
1.17%0.97%0.90%1.02%1.16%0.97%0.96%1.02%1.23%1.13%1.31%1.52%

Financials

SYK vs. SNN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stryker Corporation and Smith & Nephew plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20222023202420252026
6.02B
3.19B
(SYK) Total Revenue
(SNN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SYK vs. SNN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stryker Corporation and Smith & Nephew plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%62.0%64.0%66.0%68.0%70.0%72.0%20222023202420252026
63.3%
65.6%
Portfolio components
SYK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stryker Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.81B and revenue of 6.02B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.3%.

SNN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 3.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.6%.

SYK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stryker Corporation reported an operating income of 936.00M and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

SNN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported an operating income of 570.45M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.

SYK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stryker Corporation reported a net income of 745.00M and revenue of 6.02B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.

SNN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Smith & Nephew plc reported a net income of 330.82M and revenue of 3.19B, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SYK and SNN have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SYK has higher volatility (8.52%) compared to SNN (7.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYK dropped -58.63% vs SNN's -55.20%.

SNN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYK and SNN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer