KMB vs. SWK
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and SWK (Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while SWK operates in Tools & Accessories (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.95%/yr vs -0.15%/yr for SWK. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. SWK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than SWK's 15.04% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has outperformed SWK with an annualized return of 0.95%, while SWK has yielded a comparatively lower -0.15% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
SWK
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 12.48%
- YTD
- 15.04%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 33.97%
- 3Y*
- 1.97%
- 5Y*
- -13.22%
- 10Y*
- -0.15%
KMB vs. SWK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 15.04% | -3.17% | -15.19% | 35.55% | -58.92% | 7.28% | 9.73% | 41.18% | -28.13% | 50.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and SWK is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.29 |
The correlation between KMB and SWK shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KMB:
$5.93
SWK:
$2.65
KMB:
17.26
SWK:
31.61
KMB:
2.06
SWK:
0.84
KMB:
$16.54B
SWK:
$15.13B
KMB:
$5.93B
SWK:
$4.52B
KMB:
$3.07B
SWK:
$1.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. SWK — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
SWK
KMB vs. SWK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.16 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 1.14 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 2.54 | -3.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. SWK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum SWK drawdown of -71.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and SWK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -71.31% | +34.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -26.14% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -48.31% | +14.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -69.86% | +35.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -71.31% | +37.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -54.51% | +27.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -19.46% | +10.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 11.75% | +7.68% |
Volatility
KMB vs. SWK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 8.42%, while Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | SWK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 10.14% | -1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 27.24% | -10.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 37.82% | -12.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 37.71% | -17.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 36.69% | -15.62% |
Dividends
KMB vs. SWK - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than SWK's 3.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
SWK Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. | 3.97% | 4.44% | 4.06% | 3.28% | 4.23% | 1.58% | 1.56% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.97% | 2.01% |
Financials
KMB vs. SWK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. SWK - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
SWK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.22B and revenue of 3.68B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.2%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
SWK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported an operating income of 366.80M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
SWK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. reported a net income of 158.20M and revenue of 3.68B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and SWK have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWK has higher volatility (10.14%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs SWK's -71.31%.
SWK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and SWK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer