KMB vs. PH
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and PH (Parker-Hannifin Corporation) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while PH operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 1.74%/yr vs 25.97%/yr for PH. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KMB vs. PH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KMB having a 11.19% return and PH slightly higher at 11.56%. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed PH with an annualized return of 1.74%, while PH has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- -7.99%
- 3Y*
- -1.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.90%
PH
- 1D
- 1.43%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 11.56%
- 1Y
- 34.58%
- 3Y*
- 34.53%
- 5Y*
- 27.26%
- 10Y*
- 25.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $325.44M | $393.74M | $451.43M | |
| $537.51M | $523.59M | $635.17M |
KMB vs. PH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 11.19% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 11.56% | 39.54% | 39.58% | 60.81% | -6.91% | 18.30% | 34.78% | 40.75% | -24.00% | 44.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and PH is 0.04, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 1985 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KMB and PH has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.26, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
KMB:
$36.28B
PH:
$123.13B
KMB:
$5.93
PH:
$27.15
KMB:
18.44
PH:
35.96
KMB:
3.19
PH:
1.52
KMB:
2.20
PH:
5.96
KMB:
20.28
PH:
8.03
KMB:
$16.54B
PH:
$20.99B
KMB:
$5.93B
PH:
$7.81B
KMB:
$3.07B
PH:
$5.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. PH — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
PH
KMB vs. PH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.24 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 1.80 | -2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 5.07 | -5.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. PH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum PH drawdown of -66.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and PH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -66.92% | +29.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -19.34% | -10.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -26.79% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -28.64% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -54.68% | +20.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.48% | -4.33% | -17.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -15.30% | +6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.31% | 6.85% | +13.46% |
Volatility
KMB vs. PH - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 8.53% compared to Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH) at 6.43%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | PH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 6.43% | +2.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.63% | 19.46% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.16% | 25.70% | +1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 28.66% | -8.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 31.62% | -10.37% |
Dividends
KMB vs. PH - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than PH's 0.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.65% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
PH Parker-Hannifin Corporation | 0.76% | 0.80% | 1.00% | 1.25% | 1.73% | 1.25% | 1.29% | 1.65% | 1.97% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 2.60% |
Financials
KMB vs. PH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Parker-Hannifin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. PH - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
PH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.02B and revenue of 5.49B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
PH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
PH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Parker-Hannifin Corporation reported a net income of 904.00M and revenue of 5.49B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and PH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.53%) compared to PH (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs PH's -66.92%.
PH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and PH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer