KMB vs. PEP
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KMB in Household & Personal Products, PEP in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic. Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 1.72%/yr vs 5.54%/yr for PEP. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. PEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 14.34% return, which is significantly higher than PEP's -2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed PEP with an annualized return of 1.72%, while PEP has yielded a comparatively higher 5.54% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 2.26%
- 1M
- 10.71%
- 6M
- 17.81%
- YTD
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- -8.86%
- 3Y*
- -2.10%
- 5Y*
- 0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.72%
PEP
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -2.41%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- -6.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
KMB vs. PEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 14.34% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | -2.41% | -1.85% | -7.60% | -3.29% | 6.78% | 20.56% | 11.67% | 27.38% | -4.81% | 17.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and PEP is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.38 |
The correlation between KMB and PEP shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KMB:
$37.31B
PEP:
$187.77B
KMB:
$5.93
PEP:
$7.65
KMB:
18.96
PEP:
17.96
KMB:
3.28
PEP:
6.21
KMB:
2.26
PEP:
1.94
KMB:
20.85
PEP:
8.51
KMB:
$16.54B
PEP:
$96.90B
KMB:
$5.93B
PEP:
$52.29B
KMB:
$3.07B
PEP:
$18.40B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. PEP — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
PEP
KMB vs. PEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.06 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.36 | 0.26 | -0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.53 | 0.66 | -1.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. PEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum PEP drawdown of -73.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and PEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -73.92% | +36.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -19.03% | -10.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -29.17% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -30.32% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -30.32% | -3.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.25% | -21.68% | +2.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -13.65% | +4.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.94% | 7.57% | +12.37% |
Volatility
KMB vs. PEP - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) have volatilities of 8.21% and 8.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | PEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 8.41% | -0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.09% | 16.30% | +1.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.74% | 22.58% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 18.70% | +1.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.18% | 19.79% | +1.39% |
Dividends
KMB vs. PEP - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, more than PEP's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.52% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 4.18% | 3.92% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% |
Financials
KMB vs. PEP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and PepsiCo, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. PEP - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
PEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.11B and revenue of 24.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
PEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 24.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
PEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 24.18B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and PEP have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEP has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to KMB (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs PEP's -73.92%.
PEP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and PEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer