KMB vs. LEG
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and LEG (Leggett & Platt, Incorporated) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while LEG operates in Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 1.74%/yr vs -12.01%/yr for LEG. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KMB vs. LEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly higher than LEG's -10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has outperformed LEG with an annualized return of 1.74%, while LEG has yielded a comparatively lower -12.01% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- -7.99%
- 3Y*
- -1.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.90%
LEG
- 1D
- -2.20%
- 1M
- -16.02%
- 6M
- -15.21%
- YTD
- -10.05%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- -29.16%
- 5Y*
- -24.27%
- 10Y*
- -12.01%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $325.44M | $393.74M | $451.43M | |
| $18.50M | $23.27M | $28.03M |
KMB vs. LEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 11.19% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | -10.05% | 17.02% | -61.93% | -13.45% | -17.78% | -3.76% | -9.05% | 47.13% | -22.25% | 0.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and LEG is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 1987 | 0.26 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$36.28B
LEG:
$1.34B
KMB:
$5.93
LEG:
$1.60
KMB:
18.44
LEG:
6.13
KMB:
2.20
LEG:
0.45
KMB:
20.28
LEG:
1.33
KMB:
$16.54B
LEG:
$3.03B
KMB:
$5.93B
LEG:
$717.40M
KMB:
$3.07B
LEG:
$433.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. LEG — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
LEG
KMB vs. LEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.06 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 0.16 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 0.34 | -0.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. LEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum LEG drawdown of -86.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and LEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -86.41% | +49.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -28.51% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -76.68% | +42.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -84.29% | +50.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -86.41% | +52.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.48% | -79.20% | +57.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -19.84% | +10.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.31% | 13.72% | +6.59% |
Volatility
KMB vs. LEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 8.53%, while Leggett & Platt, Incorporated (LEG) has a volatility of 11.32%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | LEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 11.32% | -2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.63% | 32.38% | -13.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.16% | 49.36% | -22.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 42.74% | -22.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 39.96% | -18.71% |
Dividends
KMB vs. LEG - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than LEG's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.65% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
LEG Leggett & Platt, Incorporated | 2.04% | 1.82% | 6.35% | 6.95% | 5.40% | 4.03% | 3.61% | 3.11% | 4.19% | 2.98% | 2.74% | 3.00% |
Financials
KMB vs. LEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Leggett & Platt, Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and LEG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LEG has higher volatility (11.32%) compared to KMB (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs LEG's -86.41%.
LEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.09 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and LEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer