KMB vs. JNJ
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 1.48%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 17.75% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 1.48%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 9.13%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- -13.85%
- 3Y*
- -4.19%
- 5Y*
- -0.58%
- 10Y*
- 1.48%
JNJ
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 3.43%
- YTD
- 17.75%
- 6M
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- 62.31%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 10.61%
KMB vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 8.57% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 17.75% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and JNJ is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$35.56B
JNJ:
$589.29B
KMB:
$5.93
JNJ:
$8.65
KMB:
18.01
JNJ:
27.87
KMB:
3.11
JNJ:
0.93
KMB:
2.15
JNJ:
6.08
KMB:
19.80
JNJ:
7.26
KMB:
$16.54B
JNJ:
$96.36B
KMB:
$5.93B
JNJ:
$66.60B
KMB:
$3.07B
JNJ:
$31.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
JNJ
KMB vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.65 | -0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.47 | 5.71 | -6.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | 16.62 | -17.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum JNJ drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -50.67% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -10.96% | -18.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -15.95% | -18.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -18.41% | -15.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -27.37% | -6.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.33% | -2.48% | -20.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -11.90% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.71% | 3.76% | +15.95% |
Volatility
KMB vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 9.98% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 7.01%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.98% | 7.01% | +2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.53% | 12.66% | +4.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.23% | 17.39% | +8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.35% | 16.99% | +3.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.14% | 18.54% | +2.60% |
Dividends
KMB vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.76%, more than JNJ's 2.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.17% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.76% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
KMB vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and JNJ have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (9.98%) compared to JNJ (7.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.60 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer