KMB vs. JNJ
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.29%/yr vs 9.85%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a -4.92% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 0.29%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.85% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- -2.80%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- -4.92%
- 6M
- -8.51%
- 1Y
- -29.05%
- 3Y*
- -7.87%
- 5Y*
- -2.82%
- 10Y*
- 0.29%
JNJ
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.14%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 48.18%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 9.14%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
KMB vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -4.92% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 9.07% | 47.48% | -4.81% | -8.58% | 5.97% | 11.44% | 10.82% | 16.22% | -5.13% | 24.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and JNJ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$31.57B
JNJ:
$545.87B
KMB:
$5.93
JNJ:
$8.65
KMB:
15.99
JNJ:
25.81
KMB:
2.76
JNJ:
0.86
KMB:
1.91
JNJ:
5.64
KMB:
17.58
JNJ:
6.72
KMB:
$16.54B
JNJ:
$96.36B
KMB:
$5.93B
JNJ:
$66.60B
KMB:
$3.07B
JNJ:
$31.62B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
JNJ
KMB vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KMB | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.52 | -0.74 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 4.42 | -5.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 13.33 | -14.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KMB | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.17 | 2.91 | -4.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.55 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 | 0.54 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.53 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
KMB vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum JNJ drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and JNJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -50.67% | +13.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.79% | -10.96% | -18.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -15.95% | -18.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -18.41% | -15.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -27.37% | -6.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.85% | -9.67% | -23.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -11.88% | +3.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.81% | 3.63% | +16.18% |
Volatility
KMB vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.20%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | JNJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 5.20% | +1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.33% | 12.17% | +3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.88% | 16.67% | +8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.95% | 16.82% | +3.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 18.45% | +2.51% |
Dividends
KMB vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.34%, more than JNJ's 2.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 2.35% | 2.48% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.34% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
KMB vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
JNJ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
JNJ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
JNJ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and JNJ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to JNJ (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs JNJ's -50.67%.
JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and JNJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer