KMB vs. GRC
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and GRC (The Gorman-Rupp Company) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while GRC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 1.74%/yr vs 14.38%/yr for GRC. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KMB vs. GRC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 11.19% return, which is significantly lower than GRC's 70.94% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed GRC with an annualized return of 1.74%, while GRC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.38% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- 6M
- 12.19%
- YTD
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- -7.99%
- 3Y*
- -1.48%
- 5Y*
- -0.50%
- 10Y*
- 1.74%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.90%
GRC
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -8.49%
- 6M
- 49.80%
- YTD
- 70.94%
- 1Y
- 100.02%
- 3Y*
- 38.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $19.01M | $17.85M | $14.41M | |
| $325.44M | $393.74M | $451.43M |
KMB vs. GRC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 11.19% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 70.94% | 28.24% | 8.87% | 42.15% | -41.17% | 39.71% | -11.90% | 17.64% | 11.75% | 2.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and GRC is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.21 |
The correlation between KMB and GRC shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KMB:
$36.28B
GRC:
$2.14B
KMB:
$5.93
GRC:
$2.37
KMB:
18.44
GRC:
34.27
KMB:
3.19
GRC:
0.70
KMB:
2.20
GRC:
3.04
KMB:
20.28
GRC:
4.85
KMB:
$16.54B
GRC:
$702.05M
KMB:
$5.93B
GRC:
$214.56M
KMB:
$3.07B
GRC:
$129.99M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. GRC — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
GRC
KMB vs. GRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.44 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 6.75 | -7.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 17.21 | -17.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. GRC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum GRC drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and GRC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -67.23% | +30.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -14.90% | -14.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -26.87% | -7.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -49.26% | +15.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -49.26% | +15.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.48% | -11.50% | -9.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.89% | -17.59% | +8.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.31% | 5.83% | +14.48% |
Volatility
KMB vs. GRC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 8.53%, while The Gorman-Rupp Company (GRC) has a volatility of 12.13%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | GRC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.53% | 12.13% | -3.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.63% | 30.07% | -11.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.16% | 35.80% | -8.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 31.19% | -10.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 34.00% | -12.75% |
Dividends
KMB vs. GRC - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.65%, more than GRC's 0.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GRC The Gorman-Rupp Company | 0.93% | 1.56% | 1.91% | 1.98% | 2.67% | 1.43% | 1.82% | 1.47% | 7.74% | 1.51% | 1.39% | 1.52% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.65% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
KMB vs. GRC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and The Gorman-Rupp Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. GRC - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
GRC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a gross profit of 63.69M and revenue of 186.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.2%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
GRC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported an operating income of 30.41M and revenue of 186.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.3%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
GRC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, The Gorman-Rupp Company reported a net income of 19.43M and revenue of 186.07M, resulting in a net margin of 10.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and GRC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GRC has higher volatility (12.13%) compared to KMB (8.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs GRC's -67.23%.
GRC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and GRC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer