KMB vs. BF-B
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and BF-B (Brown-Forman Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Defensive sector — KMB in Household & Personal Products, BF-B in Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries. Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 1.37%/yr vs -2.27%/yr for BF-B. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. BF-B - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than BF-B's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has outperformed BF-B with an annualized return of 1.37%, while BF-B has yielded a comparatively lower -2.27% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- -10.77%
- 3Y*
- -3.71%
- 5Y*
- -0.61%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.89%
BF-B
- 1D
- 3.24%
- 1M
- -0.86%
- 6M
- 1.84%
- YTD
- 3.17%
- 1Y
- -5.57%
- 3Y*
- -25.46%
- 5Y*
- -16.48%
- 10Y*
- -2.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.70%
KMB vs. BF-B - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 10.35% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
BF-B Brown-Forman Corporation | 3.17% | -29.29% | -32.23% | -11.91% | -8.86% | -6.07% | 18.67% | 43.78% | -10.98% | 55.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and BF-B is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.35 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$36.01B
BF-B:
$12.32B
KMB:
$5.93
BF-B:
$1.71
KMB:
18.30
BF-B:
15.47
KMB:
3.16
BF-B:
19.23
KMB:
2.19
BF-B:
3.19
KMB:
$16.54B
BF-B:
$3.91B
KMB:
$5.93B
BF-B:
$2.32B
KMB:
$3.07B
BF-B:
$1.19B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. BF-B — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
BF-B
KMB vs. BF-B - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | BF-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.01 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | -0.22 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | -0.47 | -0.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. BF-B - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum BF-B drawdown of -68.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and BF-B.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | BF-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -68.96% | +31.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -25.48% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -65.65% | +31.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -68.31% | +34.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -68.96% | +34.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.08% | -63.73% | +41.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.88% | -11.73% | +2.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.10% | 11.83% | +8.27% |
Volatility
KMB vs. BF-B - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) is 8.95%, while Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B) has a volatility of 11.36%. This indicates that KMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BF-B based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | BF-B | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.95% | 11.36% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.53% | 31.77% | -13.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.01% | 38.77% | -11.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 30.26% | -9.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.23% | 28.20% | -6.97% |
Dividends
KMB vs. BF-B - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than BF-B's 3.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BF-B Brown-Forman Corporation | 3.48% | 3.49% | 2.32% | 1.46% | 1.17% | 2.37% | 0.88% | 0.99% | 3.10% | 1.09% | 1.54% | 1.29% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.68% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
KMB vs. BF-B - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Brown-Forman Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. BF-B - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
BF-B - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported a gross profit of 640.00M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
BF-B - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported an operating income of 343.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.5%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
BF-B - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported a net income of 267.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 25.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and BF-B have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BF-B has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to KMB (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs BF-B's -68.96%.
BF-B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and BF-B
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer