KMB vs. BALL
KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and BALL (Ball Corporation) are both stocks. KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive), while BALL operates in Packaging & Containers (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, KMB returned 0.95%/yr vs 5.84%/yr for BALL. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KMB vs. BALL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KMB achieves a 4.05% return, which is significantly lower than BALL's 8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, KMB has underperformed BALL with an annualized return of 0.95%, while BALL has yielded a comparatively higher 5.84% annualized return.
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
BALL
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 3.60%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 12.67%
- 1Y
- 6.33%
- 3Y*
- 3.03%
- 5Y*
- -5.69%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
KMB vs. BALL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
BALL Ball Corporation | 8.29% | -2.43% | -2.96% | 14.15% | -46.23% | 4.12% | 45.19% | 41.83% | 22.65% | 1.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between KMB and BALL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
KMB:
$34.08B
BALL:
$15.24B
KMB:
$5.93
BALL:
$3.45
KMB:
17.26
BALL:
16.52
KMB:
2.98
BALL:
0.17
KMB:
2.06
BALL:
1.13
KMB:
18.98
BALL:
2.12
KMB:
$16.54B
BALL:
$13.64B
KMB:
$5.93B
BALL:
$1.50B
KMB:
$3.07B
BALL:
$1.65B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KMB vs. BALL — Risk / Return Rank
KMB
BALL
KMB vs. BALL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) and Ball Corporation (BALL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KMB | BALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.06 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.67 | 0.22 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 0.38 | -1.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KMB vs. BALL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KMB drawdown since its inception was -36.97%, smaller than the maximum BALL drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KMB and BALL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KMB | BALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.97% | -55.09% | +18.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.60% | -21.96% | -7.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.06% | -35.62% | +1.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.06% | -55.09% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.06% | -55.09% | +21.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.52% | -37.91% | +11.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.85% | -16.49% | +7.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.43% | 12.70% | +6.73% |
Volatility
KMB vs. BALL - Volatility Comparison
Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Ball Corporation (BALL) at 7.41%. This indicates that KMB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BALL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KMB | BALL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.42% | 7.41% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.67% | 19.80% | -3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.77% | 26.16% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.19% | 30.42% | -10.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.07% | 28.33% | -7.26% |
Dividends
KMB vs. BALL - Dividend Comparison
KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than BALL's 1.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BALL Ball Corporation | 1.40% | 1.51% | 1.45% | 1.39% | 1.56% | 0.73% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 0.87% | 0.96% | 0.69% | 0.71% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
Financials
KMB vs. BALL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Ball Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KMB vs. BALL - Profitability Comparison
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
BALL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ball Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 3.60B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
BALL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ball Corporation reported an operating income of 205.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.7%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
BALL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ball Corporation reported a net income of 205.00M and revenue of 3.60B, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KMB and BALL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMB has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to BALL (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KMB dropped -36.97% vs BALL's -55.09%.
BALL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KMB and BALL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer