BALL vs. XLB
BALL (Ball Corporation) is a stock, while XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Materials fund tracking the Materials Select Sector Index. Over the past 10 years, BALL returned 4.71%/yr vs 10.23%/yr for XLB. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BALL vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BALL achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 14.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BALL has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 4.71%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.23% annualized return.
BALL
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -12.98%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 0.27%
- 3Y*
- 0.39%
- 5Y*
- -7.33%
- 10Y*
- 4.71%
XLB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- 1Y
- 19.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
BALL vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BALL Ball Corporation | 0.40% | -2.43% | -2.96% | 14.15% | -46.23% | 4.12% | 45.19% | 41.83% | 22.65% | 1.79% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 14.35% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between BALL and XLB is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 1998 | 0.56 |
The correlation between BALL and XLB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BALL vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
BALL
XLB
BALL vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ball Corporation (BALL) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BALL | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.21 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 1.62 | -1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.02 | 5.06 | -5.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BALL | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 | 1.20 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | 0.28 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | 0.50 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.36 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
BALL vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BALL drawdown since its inception was -55.09%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BALL and XLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BALL | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.09% | -59.83% | +4.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.96% | -12.38% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.62% | -23.17% | -12.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.09% | -24.72% | -30.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.09% | -37.27% | -17.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.44% | -3.28% | -39.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -10.84% | -5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.28% | 3.96% | +8.32% |
Volatility
BALL vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
Ball Corporation (BALL) has a higher volatility of 9.32% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 5.73%. This indicates that BALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BALL | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.32% | 5.73% | +3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.77% | 12.85% | +6.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.96% | 16.78% | +9.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.39% | 18.94% | +11.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.31% | 20.65% | +7.66% |
Dividends
BALL vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
BALL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than XLB's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BALL Ball Corporation | 1.51% | 1.51% | 1.45% | 1.39% | 1.56% | 0.73% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 0.87% | 0.96% | 0.69% | 0.71% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BALL and XLB have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BALL has higher volatility (9.32%) compared to XLB (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BALL dropped -55.09% vs XLB's -59.83%.
XLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BALL and XLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer