KLIP vs. KURE

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE).

KLIP and KURE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KLIP is managed by CICC. It was launched on Jan 12, 2023. KURE is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index. It was launched on Feb 1, 2018.

Performance

KLIP vs. KURE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KLIP vs. KURE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	-8.98%	16.92%	3.37%	10.67%
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF	0.18%	24.87%	-17.83%	-24.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLIP achieves a -8.98% return, which is significantly lower than KURE's 0.18% return.

KLIP

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: -5.77%
• YTD: -8.98%
• 6M: -12.63%
• 1Y: -1.25%
• 3Y*: 7.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KURE

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -2.79%
• YTD: 0.18%
• 6M: -15.23%
• 1Y: 13.79%
• 3Y*: -4.11%
• 5Y*: -12.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLIP vs. KURE - Expense Ratio Comparison

KLIP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KURE's 0.65% expense ratio.

KLIP

KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF

KURE

KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF

Return for Risk

KLIP vs. KURE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLIP

KLIP Risk / Return Rank: 11
KLIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
KLIP Omega Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
KLIP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

KURE

KURE Risk / Return Rank: 26
KURE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
KURE Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
KURE Omega Ratio Rank: 27
KURE Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
KURE Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLIP vs. KURE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KLIP	KURE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	0.48	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	0.82	-0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.11	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	0.62	-0.70
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.26	1.31	-1.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KLIP vs. KURE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLIP Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the KURE Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLIP and KURE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KLIP	KURE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	0.48	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	-0.06	+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between KLIP and KURE is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

KLIP vs. KURE - Dividend Comparison

KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.24%, more than KURE's 4.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF	28.24%	25.14%	54.26%	61.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF	4.19%	4.19%	1.29%	0.65%	0.05%	14.12%	0.00%	0.25%	0.21%

Drawdowns

KLIP vs. KURE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLIP drawdown since its inception was -18.61%, smaller than the maximum KURE drawdown of -68.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIP and KURE.

Drawdown Indicators

	KLIP	KURE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.61%	-68.53%	+49.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.23%	-22.72%	+5.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-67.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.21%	-56.38%	+42.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.34%	-37.67%	+34.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.18%	10.71%	-5.53%

Volatility

KLIP vs. KURE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) is 7.16%, while KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) has a volatility of 9.06%. This indicates that KLIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KURE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KLIP	KURE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.16%	9.06%	-1.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.48%	17.78%	-4.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.76%	28.85%	-9.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.19%	31.89%	-13.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.19%	32.52%	-14.33%