KLIP vs. GIAX
KLIP (KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF) and GIAX (Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KLIP is a Options Trading fund managed by CICC, while GIAX is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Nicholas. Over the past year, KLIP returned -5.93% vs 17.38% for GIAX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KLIP charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for GIAX.
Performance
KLIP vs. GIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLIP achieves a -10.03% return, which is significantly lower than GIAX's 12.55% return.
KLIP
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- -14.56%
- YTD
- -10.03%
- 1Y
- -5.93%
- 3Y*
- 5.58%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GIAX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- 7.81%
- YTD
- 12.55%
- 1Y
- 17.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KLIP vs. GIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | -10.03% | 16.92% | 3.64% |
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 12.55% | 11.73% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLIP and GIAX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2024 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLIP vs. GIAX — Risk / Return Rank
KLIP
GIAX
KLIP vs. GIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) and Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLIP | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.14 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 0.99 | -1.27 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 3.64 | -4.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLIP vs. GIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLIP drawdown since its inception was -21.48%, which is greater than GIAX's maximum drawdown of -20.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLIP and GIAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLIP | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.48% | -20.38% | -1.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.48% | -17.62% | -3.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.48% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.19% | -10.49% | -4.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.18% | -3.23% | -0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.65% | 4.79% | +3.86% |
Volatility
KLIP vs. GIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF (KLIP) is 5.26%, while Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF (GIAX) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that KLIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLIP | GIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 8.00% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.10% | 21.54% | -8.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.55% | 23.94% | -7.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 22.14% | -4.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.10% | 22.14% | -4.04% |
KLIP vs. GIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
KLIP has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GIAX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
KLIP vs. GIAX - Dividend Comparison
KLIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.64%, more than GIAX's 25.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GIAX Nicholas Global Equity and Income ETF | 25.65% | 25.62% | 10.58% | 0.00% |
KLIP KraneShares China Internet and Covered Call Strategy ETF | 28.64% | 25.14% | 54.26% | 61.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KLIP and GIAX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GIAX has higher volatility (8.00%) compared to KLIP (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLIP dropped -21.48% vs GIAX's -20.38%.
On 1-year performance, GIAX leads with 17.38% vs -5.93% for KLIP. On fees, KLIP is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, KLIP has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GIAX has performed better with a 17.38% return vs -5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KLIP is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for GIAX.
KLIP has the higher dividend yield at 28.64%, compared with 25.65% for GIAX.
KLIP is categorized as Options Trading, while GIAX is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: CICC and Nicholas. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for KLIP and 0.97% for GIAX.
GIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KLIP and GIAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer