PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KLAC vs. ML.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KLAC vs. ML.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KLA Corporation (KLAC) and Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

KLAC is traded in USD, while ML.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ML.PA values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KLAC achieves a 110.02% return, which is significantly higher than ML.PA's 20.52% return. Over the past 10 years, KLAC has outperformed ML.PA with an annualized return of 45.08%, while ML.PA has yielded a comparatively lower 14.29% annualized return.


KLAC

1D
5.55%
1M
37.79%
YTD
110.02%
6M
113.75%
1Y
192.78%
3Y*
75.88%
5Y*
52.93%
10Y*
45.08%

ML.PA

1D
2.68%
1M
8.41%
YTD
20.52%
6M
21.70%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
6.14%
10Y*
14.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KLAC vs. ML.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KLAC
KLA Corporation
110.02%94.48%9.36%56.05%-11.20%68.05%47.94%103.99%-12.49%36.80%
ML.PA
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
20.52%5.09%-4.69%34.74%-20.35%38.18%14.64%43.04%-21.60%45.16%

Correlation

The correlation between KLAC and ML.PA is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2007

0.30

The correlation between KLAC and ML.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KLAC vs. ML.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KLAC
KLAC Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KLAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KLAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KLAC Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KLAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
KLAC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

ML.PA
ML.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ML.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ML.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ML.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ML.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ML.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KLAC vs. ML.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLA Corporation (KLAC) and Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KLACML.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.07

+0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.66

0.28

+8.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.54

0.58

+26.96

KLAC vs. ML.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KLAC Sharpe Ratio is 3.93, which is higher than the ML.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KLAC and ML.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KLAC vs. ML.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KLAC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, which is greater than ML.PA's maximum drawdown of -75.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAC and ML.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KLACML.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.74%

-75.37%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.41%

-20.89%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.95%

-24.42%

-10.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.28%

-42.71%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.28%

-42.71%

+2.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.06%

+2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.32%

-15.97%

-13.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.03%

10.19%

-3.16%

Volatility

KLAC vs. ML.PA - Volatility Comparison

KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a higher volatility of 22.17% compared to Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) at 5.60%. This indicates that KLAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ML.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KLACML.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.17%

5.60%

+16.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

42.02%

17.83%

+24.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.38%

24.17%

+25.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.88%

27.14%

+16.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.86%

28.31%

+13.55%

Dividends

KLAC vs. ML.PA - Dividend Comparison

KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than ML.PA's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KLAC
KLA Corporation
0.31%0.61%0.96%0.92%1.25%0.91%1.35%1.74%3.17%2.15%2.67%2.94%
ML.PA
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
4.16%4.87%4.25%3.85%17.31%6.38%7.62%13.56%16.38%10.87%10.78%11.37%

Financials

KLAC vs. ML.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KLA Corporation and Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. KLAC values in USD, ML.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


KLAC and ML.PA have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KLAC and ML.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer