KLAC vs. AMAT
KLAC (KLA Corporation) and AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductor Equipment & Materials industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, KLAC returned 45.08%/yr vs 38.86%/yr for AMAT. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
KLAC vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KLAC achieves a 110.02% return, which is significantly lower than AMAT's 121.28% return. Over the past 10 years, KLAC has outperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 45.08%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively lower 38.86% annualized return.
KLAC
- 1D
- 5.55%
- 1M
- 41.25%
- YTD
- 110.02%
- 6M
- 113.75%
- 1Y
- 195.25%
- 3Y*
- 75.88%
- 5Y*
- 52.93%
- 10Y*
- 45.08%
AMAT
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 30.08%
- YTD
- 121.28%
- 6M
- 119.38%
- 1Y
- 234.96%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 34.02%
- 10Y*
- 38.86%
KLAC vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KLAC KLA Corporation | 110.02% | 94.48% | 9.36% | 56.05% | -11.20% | 68.05% | 47.94% | 103.99% | -12.49% | 36.80% |
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 121.28% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 89.86% | -34.92% | 59.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between KLAC and AMAT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.71 |
The correlation between KLAC and AMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
KLAC:
$33.62B
AMAT:
$453.23B
KLAC:
$35.29
AMAT:
$10.61
KLAC:
7.21
AMAT:
53.45
KLAC:
0.27
AMAT:
6.80
KLAC:
2.57
AMAT:
15.67
KLAC:
5.77
AMAT:
18.96
KLAC:
$13.10B
AMAT:
$29.02B
KLAC:
$8.09B
AMAT:
$14.21B
KLAC:
$5.77B
AMAT:
$9.92B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KLAC vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank
KLAC
AMAT
KLAC vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KLA Corporation (KLAC) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KLAC | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.59 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.66 | 10.67 | -2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 27.54 | 30.41 | -2.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KLAC vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KLAC drawdown since its inception was -83.74%, roughly equal to the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KLAC and AMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KLAC | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.74% | -85.22% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.41% | -21.37% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.95% | -49.88% | +14.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.28% | -55.14% | +14.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.28% | -55.14% | +14.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.32% | -38.78% | +9.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 7.49% | -0.46% |
Volatility
KLAC vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison
KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a higher volatility of 22.17% compared to Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) at 20.52%. This indicates that KLAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KLAC | AMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.17% | 20.52% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.02% | 38.83% | +3.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.38% | 49.03% | +0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.88% | 44.20% | -0.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.86% | 42.94% | -1.08% |
Dividends
KLAC vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison
KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than AMAT's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.34% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
KLAC KLA Corporation | 0.31% | 0.61% | 0.96% | 0.92% | 1.25% | 0.91% | 1.35% | 1.74% | 3.17% | 2.15% | 2.67% | 2.94% |
Financials
KLAC vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KLA Corporation and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KLAC vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison
KLAC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 3.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.1%.
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.
KLAC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.41B and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.2%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.
KLAC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.20B and revenue of 3.42B, resulting in a net margin of 35.2%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KLAC and AMAT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KLAC has higher volatility (22.17%) compared to AMAT (20.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KLAC dropped -83.74% vs AMAT's -85.22%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.65 vs 3.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KLAC and AMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer