AMAT vs. TER

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER).

Performance

AMAT vs. TER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMAT vs. TER - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc.	33.16%	59.60%	1.13%	67.97%	-37.54%	83.64%	43.29%	89.86%	-34.92%	59.86%
TER Teradyne, Inc.	53.23%	54.39%	16.51%	24.78%	-46.35%	36.81%	76.73%	118.93%	-24.37%	66.16%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AMAT : $273.09B TER : $46.74B
EPS AMAT : $9.73 TER : $3.48
PE Ratio AMAT : 35.13 TER : 85.22
PS Ratio AMAT : 9.76 TER : 14.80
PB Ratio AMAT : 12.57 TER : 16.72
Total Revenue (TTM) AMAT : $28.21B TER : $3.19B
Gross Profit (TTM) AMAT : $13.75B TER : $1.86B
EBITDA (TTM) AMAT : $9.59B TER : $779.72M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a 33.16% return, which is significantly lower than TER's 53.23% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAT has outperformed TER with an annualized return of 33.40%, while TER has yielded a comparatively lower 30.61% annualized return.

AMAT

• 1D: 5.78%
• 1M: -8.20%
• YTD: 33.16%
• 6M: 67.47%
• 1Y: 137.63%
• 3Y*: 41.87%
• 5Y*: 20.31%
• 10Y*: 33.40%

TER

• 1D: 7.28%
• 1M: -7.36%
• YTD: 53.23%
• 6M: 115.64%
• 1Y: 260.24%
• 3Y*: 40.80%
• 5Y*: 18.61%
• 10Y*: 30.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMAT vs. TER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAT

AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

TER

TER Risk / Return Rank: 98
TER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
TER Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
TER Omega Ratio Rank: 96
TER Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
TER Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAT vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMAT	TER	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	4.21	-1.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	4.28	-1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.57	-0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.44	12.75	-6.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.96	38.79	-20.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMAT vs. TER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is lower than the TER Sharpe Ratio of 4.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAT and TER, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMAT	TER	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	4.21	-1.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.39	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.70	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.21	+0.20

Correlation

The correlation between AMAT and TER is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMAT vs. TER - Dividend Comparison

AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, more than TER's 0.17% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc.	0.54%	0.69%	0.93%	0.75%	1.05%	0.60%	1.01%	1.36%	2.14%	0.78%	1.24%	2.14%
TER Teradyne, Inc.	0.17%	0.25%	0.38%	0.41%	0.50%	0.24%	0.33%	0.53%	1.15%	0.67%	0.94%	1.16%

Drawdowns

AMAT vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and TER.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMAT	TER	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.22%	-97.30%	+12.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.37%	-20.35%	-1.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.14%	-59.12%	+3.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.14%	-59.12%	+3.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.46%	-13.52%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.96%	-58.93%	+19.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.67%	6.69%	+0.98%

Volatility

AMAT vs. TER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) is 17.09%, while Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a volatility of 23.19%. This indicates that AMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMAT	TER	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.09%	23.19%	-6.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.94%	45.67%	-10.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.10%	62.25%	-13.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.28%	47.65%	-4.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.40%	43.72%	-1.32%

Financials

AMAT vs. TER - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Applied Materials, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 7.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

TER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 622.85M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.10B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

TER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 310.18M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.6%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.

TER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 257.22M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 23.7%.