AMAT vs. TER
Compare and contrast key facts about Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMAT or TER.
Correlation
The correlation between AMAT and TER is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AMAT vs. TER - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AMAT:
-0.34
TER:
-0.62
AMAT:
-0.17
TER:
-0.55
AMAT:
0.98
TER:
0.93
AMAT:
-0.33
TER:
-0.53
AMAT:
-0.57
TER:
-1.04
AMAT:
28.70%
TER:
29.97%
AMAT:
48.62%
TER:
53.84%
AMAT:
-85.22%
TER:
-97.30%
AMAT:
-31.25%
TER:
-49.30%
Fundamentals
AMAT:
$140.58B
TER:
$13.62B
AMAT:
$7.64
TER:
$3.53
AMAT:
22.65
TER:
24.05
AMAT:
1.91
TER:
1.42
AMAT:
5.09
TER:
4.69
AMAT:
7.33
TER:
4.87
AMAT:
$20.99B
TER:
$2.91B
AMAT:
$10.04B
TER:
$1.72B
AMAT:
$6.48B
TER:
$715.65M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a 7.32% return, which is significantly higher than TER's -33.01% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAT has outperformed TER with an annualized return of 25.67%, while TER has yielded a comparatively lower 15.93% annualized return.
AMAT
7.32%
20.49%
-4.29%
-16.31%
28.63%
25.67%
TER
-33.01%
14.09%
-20.61%
-33.44%
8.66%
15.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMAT vs. TER — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AMAT
TER
AMAT vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AMAT vs. TER - Dividend Comparison
AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than TER's 0.57% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.92% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% | 1.61% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.57% | 0.38% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 0.91% |
Drawdowns
AMAT vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and TER. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
AMAT vs. TER - Volatility Comparison
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER) have volatilities of 12.24% and 11.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
AMAT vs. TER - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMAT vs. TER - Profitability Comparison
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.50B and revenue of 7.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.8%.
TER - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Teradyne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 415.34M and revenue of 685.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.18B and revenue of 7.17B, resulting in an operating margin of 30.4%.
TER - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Teradyne, Inc. reported an operating income of 120.80M and revenue of 685.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 1.19B and revenue of 7.17B, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.
TER - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Teradyne, Inc. reported a net income of 98.90M and revenue of 685.68M, resulting in a net margin of 14.4%.