AMAT vs. TER
Compare and contrast key facts about Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMAT or TER.
Key characteristics
| AMAT | TER | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.14% | 11.12% |
| 1Y Return | 83.06% | 34.46% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 17.62% | -0.29% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 37.44% | 20.07% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 28.67% | 22.14% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.38 | 0.90 |
| Daily Std Dev | 34.28% | 34.93% |
| Max Drawdown | -85.22% | -97.30% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.17% | -27.83% |
Fundamentals
| AMAT | TER | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $169.58B | $17.46B |
| EPS | $8.49 | $2.62 |
| PE Ratio | 24.04 | 43.56 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.48 | 1.34 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $26.49B | $2.66B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $11.99B | $1.87B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $8.14B | $615.20M |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAT and TER is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AMAT vs. TER - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a 26.14% return, which is significantly higher than TER's 11.12% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAT has outperformed TER with an annualized return of 28.67%, while TER has yielded a comparatively lower 22.14% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMAT vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMAT vs. TER - Dividend Comparison
AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, more than TER's 0.37% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% | 1.61% | 2.21% |
TER Teradyne, Inc. | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.24% | 0.33% | 0.53% | 1.15% | 0.67% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 0.91% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AMAT vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and TER. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMAT vs. TER - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) is 10.28%, while Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a volatility of 14.60%. This indicates that AMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AMAT vs. TER - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities