AMAT vs. TER

In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a -7.45% return, which is significantly higher than TER's -38.55% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAT has outperformed TER with an annualized return of 23.96%, while TER has yielded a comparatively lower 16.43% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AMAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is comparable to the TER Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAT and TER, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than TER's 0.62% yield.

The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and TER. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) is 23.72%, while Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a volatility of 26.90%. This indicates that AMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.