PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMAT vs. TER
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AMAT and TER is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

AMAT vs. TER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-13.96%
-7.80%
AMAT
TER

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AMAT:

0.52

TER:

0.73

Sortino Ratio

AMAT:

0.96

TER:

1.20

Omega Ratio

AMAT:

1.13

TER:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

AMAT:

0.61

TER:

0.76

Martin Ratio

AMAT:

1.15

TER:

1.84

Ulcer Index

AMAT:

19.34%

TER:

17.75%

Daily Std Dev

AMAT:

42.86%

TER:

44.68%

Max Drawdown

AMAT:

-85.22%

TER:

-97.30%

Current Drawdown

AMAT:

-26.55%

TER:

-17.33%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMAT:

$145.15B

TER:

$21.97B

EPS

AMAT:

$8.62

TER:

$3.14

PE Ratio

AMAT:

20.69

TER:

42.97

PEG Ratio

AMAT:

1.74

TER:

1.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMAT:

$27.18B

TER:

$2.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMAT:

$12.90B

TER:

$1.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMAT:

$8.26B

TER:

$542.88M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a 14.67% return, which is significantly higher than TER's 9.25% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAT has outperformed TER with an annualized return of 24.66%, while TER has yielded a comparatively lower 23.06% annualized return.


AMAT

YTD

14.67%

1M

9.48%

6M

-13.96%

1Y

22.54%

5Y*

25.56%

10Y*

24.66%

TER

YTD

9.25%

1M

7.47%

6M

-7.80%

1Y

34.29%

5Y*

14.91%

10Y*

23.06%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMAT vs. TER — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMAT is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMAT is 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMAT is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMAT is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMAT is 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMAT is 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

TER
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of TER is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of TER is 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of TER is 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of TER is 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of TER is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of TER is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AMAT vs. TER - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Teradyne, Inc. (TER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMAT, currently valued at 0.52, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.000.520.73
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMAT, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.961.20
The chart of Omega ratio for AMAT, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.131.16
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMAT, currently valued at 0.61, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.610.76
The chart of Martin ratio for AMAT, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.151.84
AMAT
TER

The current AMAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is comparable to the TER Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAT and TER, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.52
0.73
AMAT
TER

Dividends

AMAT vs. TER - Dividend Comparison

AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, more than TER's 0.35% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.82%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%1.61%
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
0.35%0.38%0.41%0.50%0.24%0.33%0.53%1.15%0.67%0.94%1.16%0.91%

Drawdowns

AMAT vs. TER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, smaller than the maximum TER drawdown of -97.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and TER. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-26.55%
-17.33%
AMAT
TER

Volatility

AMAT vs. TER - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) is 9.96%, while Teradyne, Inc. (TER) has a volatility of 10.99%. This indicates that AMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
9.96%
10.99%
AMAT
TER

Financials

AMAT vs. TER - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials, Inc. and Teradyne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab