AMAT vs. ASML

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML).

Performance

AMAT vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMAT vs. ASML - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc.	33.16%	59.60%	1.13%	67.97%	-37.54%	83.64%	43.29%	89.86%	-34.92%	59.86%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	23.62%	56.51%	-7.70%	39.91%	-30.49%	64.13%	66.06%	93.56%	-9.80%	56.23%

Fundamentals

Market Cap AMAT : $273.09B ASML : $513.67B
EPS AMAT : $9.73 ASML : $23.77
PE Ratio AMAT : 35.13 ASML : 55.57
PEG Ratio AMAT : 4.47 ASML : 3.99
PS Ratio AMAT : 9.76 ASML : 16.35
PB Ratio AMAT : 12.57 ASML : 26.20
Total Revenue (TTM) AMAT : $28.21B ASML : $31.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) AMAT : $13.75B ASML : $16.58B
EBITDA (TTM) AMAT : $9.59B ASML : $11.94B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a 33.16% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 23.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAT has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 33.40%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 30.71% annualized return.

AMAT

• 1D: 5.78%
• 1M: -8.20%
• YTD: 33.16%
• 6M: 67.47%
• 1Y: 137.63%
• 3Y*: 41.87%
• 5Y*: 20.31%
• 10Y*: 33.40%

ASML

• 1D: 5.33%
• 1M: -8.94%
• YTD: 23.62%
• 6M: 36.86%
• 1Y: 101.57%
• 3Y*: 26.02%
• 5Y*: 16.89%
• 10Y*: 30.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

AMAT vs. ASML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAT

AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 95
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 93
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 96

ASML

ASML Risk / Return Rank: 93
ASML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ASML Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ASML Omega Ratio Rank: 90
ASML Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
ASML Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAT vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMAT	ASML	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	2.45	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.05	3.04	+0.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.39	+0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.44	5.49	+0.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.96	15.40	+2.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMAT vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAT Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is comparable to the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAT and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMAT	ASML	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	2.45	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	0.41	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.81	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.54	-0.13

Correlation

The correlation between AMAT and ASML is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMAT vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than ASML's 0.71% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc.	0.54%	0.69%	0.93%	0.75%	1.05%	0.60%	1.01%	1.36%	2.14%	0.78%	1.24%	2.14%
ASML ASML Holding N.V.	0.71%	0.97%	0.97%	0.86%	1.27%	0.50%	0.50%	1.40%	0.94%	0.64%	0.92%	0.73%

Drawdowns

AMAT vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and ASML.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMAT	ASML	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.22%	-90.00%	+4.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.37%	-17.85%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-55.14%	-56.84%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-55.14%	-56.84%	+1.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.46%	-13.47%	+0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.96%	-28.28%	-10.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.67%	6.37%	+1.30%

Volatility

AMAT vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a higher volatility of 17.09% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 14.88%. This indicates that AMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMAT	ASML	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.09%	14.88%	+2.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.94%	29.34%	+5.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	49.10%	41.81%	+7.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.28%	41.55%	+1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	42.40%	38.06%	+4.34%

Financials

AMAT vs. ASML - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Applied Materials, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.44B and revenue of 7.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

ASML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a gross profit of 4.47B and revenue of 8.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.1%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.10B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.9%.

ASML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 8.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.8%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.03B and revenue of 7.01B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.

ASML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, ASML Holding N.V. reported a net income of 2.07B and revenue of 8.43B, resulting in a net margin of 24.6%.