AMAT vs. ASML

In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a -7.45% return, which is significantly lower than ASML's -2.40% return. Over the past 10 years, AMAT has outperformed ASML with an annualized return of 23.96%, while ASML has yielded a comparatively lower 21.11% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AMAT Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is comparable to the ASML Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAT and ASML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than ASML's 1.00% yield.

The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a higher volatility of 23.72% compared to ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) at 21.06%. This indicates that AMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.