PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AMAT vs. ASML
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


AMATASML
YTD Return17.10%15.38%
1Y Return68.42%38.55%
3Y Return (Ann)13.00%10.09%
5Y Return (Ann)35.17%34.86%
10Y Return (Ann)27.90%27.79%
Sharpe Ratio1.981.19
Daily Std Dev33.89%32.74%
Max Drawdown-85.22%-90.01%
Current Drawdown-11.04%-16.74%

Fundamentals


AMATASML
Market Cap$157.68B$353.75B
EPS$8.50$19.25
PE Ratio22.3344.65
PEG Ratio2.482.81
Revenue (TTM)$26.49B$26.10B
Gross Profit (TTM)$11.99B$10.70B
EBITDA (TTM)$8.14B$8.93B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between AMAT and ASML is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

AMAT vs. ASML - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a 17.10% return, which is significantly higher than ASML's 15.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AMAT having a 27.90% annualized return and ASML not far behind at 27.79%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%20.00%40.00%60.00%80.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
41.69%
48.90%
AMAT
ASML

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Applied Materials, Inc.

ASML Holding N.V.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

AMAT vs. ASML - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and ASML Holding N.V. (ASML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMAT
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMAT, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.98
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMAT, currently valued at 2.72, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.72
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMAT, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.33
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMAT, currently valued at 2.02, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.002.02
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMAT, currently valued at 12.03, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0012.03
ASML
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ASML, currently valued at 1.19, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.001.19
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ASML, currently valued at 1.73, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.73
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ASML, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.22
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ASML, currently valued at 1.12, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.005.001.12
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ASML, currently valued at 3.62, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.62

AMAT vs. ASML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the ASML Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of AMAT and ASML.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.50NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
1.98
1.19
AMAT
ASML

Dividends

AMAT vs. ASML - Dividend Comparison

AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, less than ASML's 0.75% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.68%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%1.61%2.21%
ASML
ASML Holding N.V.
0.75%0.85%1.27%0.50%0.59%1.20%1.10%0.75%1.02%0.91%0.78%0.75%

Drawdowns

AMAT vs. ASML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, smaller than the maximum ASML drawdown of -90.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and ASML. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-11.04%
-16.74%
AMAT
ASML

Volatility

AMAT vs. ASML - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) is 7.89%, while ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) has a volatility of 11.09%. This indicates that AMAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
7.89%
11.09%
AMAT
ASML

Financials

AMAT vs. ASML - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials, Inc. and ASML Holding N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items