KJD vs. KBA
KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) and KBA (KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF) are both China Equities funds. KJD is actively managed, while KBA is passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KJD charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KBA.
Performance
KJD vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KJD achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's 7.54% return.
KJD
- 1D
- 2.57%
- 1M
- 7.71%
- 6M
- -2.89%
- YTD
- 1.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KBA
- 1D
- -2.09%
- 1M
- -2.95%
- 6M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 7.54%
- 1Y
- 36.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.17%
- 10Y*
- 9.32%
KJD vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | 1.45% | -28.21% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 7.54% | 8.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between KJD and KBA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2025 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KJD vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank
KJD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
KBA
KJD vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KJD | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.32 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KJD vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KJD drawdown since its inception was -50.81%, roughly equal to the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJD and KBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KJD | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.81% | -53.24% | +2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -31.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -39.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.25% | -6.13% | -26.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.34% | -25.60% | -4.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.28% | — |
Volatility
KJD vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KJD | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.30% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.33% | 20.29% | +41.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.33% | 27.47% | +33.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.33% | 25.46% | +35.87% |
KJD vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
KJD has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
KJD vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
KJD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KBA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.45% | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 49.05% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.46% | 6.62% | 29.08% |
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KJD and KBA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KBA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KBA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.
KBA has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for KJD.
They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and CICC. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KJD and 0.60% for KBA.
Find the right allocation for KJD and KBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer