KJD vs. ASHS

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KJD (KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF) and ASHS (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KJD is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by KraneShares, while ASHS is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI 500 Index. KJD is actively managed, while ASHS is passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KJD charges 1.26%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHS.

Performance

KJD vs. ASHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KJD achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly lower than ASHS's 15.10% return.

KJD

• 1D: -4.75%
• 1M: -6.67%
• YTD: 1.96%
• 6M: -6.94%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASHS

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 15.10%
• 6M: 23.90%
• 1Y: 57.65%
• 3Y*: 13.41%
• 5Y*: 3.97%
• 10Y*: 3.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KJD vs. ASHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	1.96%	-27.86%
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	15.10%	5.20%

Correlation

The correlation between KJD and ASHS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

KJD vs. ASHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ASHS

ASHS Risk / Return Rank: 74
ASHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
ASHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
ASHS Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ASHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
ASHS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KJD vs. ASHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF (KJD) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KJD	ASHS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.57	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.62	0.19	-0.81

Drawdowns

KJD vs. ASHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KJD drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum ASHS drawdown of -69.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KJD and ASHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	KJD	ASHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.17%	-69.90%	+20.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.81%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-47.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.90%	-33.57%	+1.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.63%	-48.57%	+19.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.21%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KJD	ASHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	7.33%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	17.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.90%	22.59%	+40.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.90%	26.46%	+36.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	62.90%	25.57%	+37.33%

KJD vs. ASHS - Expense Ratio Comparison

KJD has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than ASHS's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

KJD vs. ASHS - Dividend Comparison

Neither KJD nor ASHS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ASHS Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.69%	0.65%	1.90%	0.76%	0.43%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	8.34%
KJD KraneShares 2X Long JD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KJD and ASHS in my portfolio?

KJD and ASHS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KJD or ASHS?

On fees, ASHS is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KJD or ASHS?

ASHS is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.26% for KJD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KJD or ASHS?

KJD and ASHS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KJD and ASHS?

KJD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while ASHS is China Equities. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 1.26% for KJD and 0.65% for ASHS.