KINS vs. L

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and Loews Corporation (L).

Performance

KINS vs. L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and Loews Corporation (L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

KINS vs. L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	-13.16%	11.54%	613.15%	57.78%	-72.27%	-22.97%	-11.56%	-54.74%	-3.80%	39.37%
L Loews Corporation	1.42%	24.68%	22.09%	19.78%	1.41%	28.89%	-13.69%	15.89%	-8.56%	8.56%

Fundamentals

Market Cap KINS : $209.56M L : $22.32B
EPS KINS : $1.02K L : $7.97
PE Ratio KINS : 0.01 L : 13.40
PEG Ratio KINS : 0.00 L : 0.79
PS Ratio KINS : 0.00 L : 1.22
PB Ratio KINS : 0.00 L : 1.19
Total Revenue (TTM) KINS : $56.58B L : $18.25B
Gross Profit (TTM) KINS : $61.86M L : $5.95B
EBITDA (TTM) KINS : $19.24B L : $1.37B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KINS achieves a -13.16% return, which is significantly lower than L's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, KINS has underperformed L with an annualized return of 7.75%, while L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.

KINS

• 1D: 0.97%
• 1M: -11.59%
• YTD: -13.16%
• 6M: -0.24%
• 1Y: -11.63%
• 3Y*: 122.46%
• 5Y*: 13.60%
• 10Y*: 7.75%

L

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.98%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 6.45%
• 1Y: 16.43%
• 3Y*: 22.92%
• 5Y*: 15.77%
• 10Y*: 11.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

KINS vs. L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KINS

KINS Risk / Return Rank: 31
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 30
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 34

L

L Risk / Return Rank: 70
L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
L Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
L Omega Ratio Rank: 65
L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KINS vs. L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and Loews Corporation (L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KINS	L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.23	0.88	-1.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.02	1.25	-1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.18	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.35	1.48	-1.83
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.48	5.20	-5.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KINS vs. L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KINS Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the L Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KINS and L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KINS	L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.23	0.88	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19	0.81	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	0.45	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.02	0.33	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between KINS and L is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

KINS vs. L - Dividend Comparison

KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, more than L's 0.23% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	1.03%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	8.89%	3.20%	2.74%	4.19%	2.26%	1.61%	1.82%	2.36%
L Loews Corporation	0.23%	0.24%	0.30%	0.36%	0.43%	0.43%	0.56%	0.48%	0.55%	1.58%	0.53%	0.65%

Drawdowns

KINS vs. L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KINS drawdown since its inception was -99.52%, which is greater than L's maximum drawdown of -65.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KINS and L.

Drawdown Indicators

	KINS	L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.52%	-65.58%	-33.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.84%	-12.16%	-26.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.33%	-26.11%	-65.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.20%	-48.53%	-47.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.10%	-4.86%	-27.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.46%	-16.81%	-32.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.85%	3.47%	+24.38%

Volatility

KINS vs. L - Volatility Comparison

Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) has a higher volatility of 8.23% compared to Loews Corporation (L) at 4.54%. This indicates that KINS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KINS	L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.23%	4.54%	+3.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.34%	10.63%	+11.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.08%	18.70%	+32.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.50%	19.48%	+53.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.08%	25.55%	+33.53%

Financials

KINS vs. L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kingstone Companies, Inc. and Loews Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KINS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 56.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loews Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.73B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

KINS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 56.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loews Corporation reported an operating income of 619.00M and revenue of 4.73B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

KINS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 14.76B and revenue of 56.42B, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.

L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Loews Corporation reported a net income of 402.00M and revenue of 4.73B, resulting in a net margin of 8.5%.