KINS vs. L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

KINS (Kingstone Companies, Inc.) and L (Loews Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Insurance - Property & Casualty industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, KINS returned 7.27%/yr vs 10.61%/yr for L. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

KINS vs. L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and Loews Corporation (L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KINS achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than L's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, KINS has underperformed L with an annualized return of 7.27%, while L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.61% annualized return.

KINS

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: -2.13%
• YTD: -9.29%
• 6M: 1.91%
• 1Y: -2.30%
• 3Y*: 122.25%
• 5Y*: 14.73%
• 10Y*: 7.27%

L

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -0.60%
• YTD: -0.69%
• 6M: -1.11%
• 1Y: 16.84%
• 3Y*: 22.02%
• 5Y*: 12.86%
• 10Y*: 10.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KINS vs. L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	-9.29%	11.54%	613.15%	57.78%	-72.27%	-22.97%	-11.56%	-54.74%	-3.80%	39.37%
L Loews Corporation	-0.69%	24.68%	22.09%	19.78%	1.41%	28.89%	-13.69%	15.89%	-8.56%	8.56%

Correlation

The correlation between KINS and L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 1999	0.09

Over the past year, KINS and L have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap KINS : $219.26M L : $21.55B
EPS KINS : -$399.22 L : $8.96
PS Ratio KINS : 0.00 L : 1.19
PB Ratio KINS : 0.00 L : 1.15
Total Revenue (TTM) KINS : $59.92B L : $18.29B
Gross Profit (TTM) KINS : $100.92M L : $8.42B
EBITDA (TTM) KINS : -$6.57B L : $2.64B

Return for Risk

KINS vs. L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KINS

KINS Risk / Return Rank: 36
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 36

L

L Risk / Return Rank: 71
L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
L Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
L Omega Ratio Rank: 64
L Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
L Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KINS vs. L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and Loews Corporation (L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KINS	L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	1.06	-1.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.20	1.48	-1.28
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.19	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	2.12	-2.21
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.21	5.62	-5.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KINS vs. L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KINS Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the L Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KINS and L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KINS	L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06	1.06	-1.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	0.66	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.12	0.42	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.07	0.33	-0.26

Drawdowns

KINS vs. L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KINS drawdown since its inception was -96.97%, which is greater than L's maximum drawdown of -65.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KINS and L.

Drawdown Indicators

	KINS	L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.97%	-65.58%	-31.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.22%	-7.99%	-16.23%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.84%	-12.16%	-26.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-91.00%	-26.11%	-64.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-96.20%	-48.53%	-47.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-29.08%	-7.18%	-21.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-49.30%	-16.75%	-32.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.82%	3.01%	+7.81%

Volatility

KINS vs. L - Volatility Comparison

Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) has a higher volatility of 15.55% compared to Loews Corporation (L) at 4.68%. This indicates that KINS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KINS	L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.55%	4.68%	+10.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.66%	12.48%	+16.18%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.74%	15.88%	+23.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.67%	19.61%	+53.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	59.33%	25.63%	+33.70%

Dividends

KINS vs. L - Dividend Comparison

KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than L's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KINS Kingstone Companies, Inc.	1.32%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	8.89%	3.20%	2.74%	4.19%	2.26%	1.61%	1.82%	2.36%
L Loews Corporation	0.24%	0.24%	0.30%	0.36%	0.43%	0.43%	0.56%	0.48%	0.55%	1.58%	0.53%	0.65%

Financials

KINS vs. L - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kingstone Companies, Inc. and Loews Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

KINS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 59.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loews Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.38B and revenue of 4.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

KINS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 59.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loews Corporation reported an operating income of 539.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.

KINS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a net income of -5.81B and revenue of 59.78B, resulting in a net margin of -9.7%.

L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Loews Corporation reported a net income of 572.00M and revenue of 4.56B, resulting in a net margin of 12.6%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KINS and L in my portfolio?

KINS and L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KINS or L?

KINS has higher volatility (15.55%) compared to L (4.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KINS dropped -96.97% vs L's -65.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

L currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.