PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KINS vs. BOSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KINS vs. BOSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KINS achieves a 2.85% return, which is significantly higher than BOSC's -2.41% return. Over the past 10 years, KINS has outperformed BOSC with an annualized return of 9.19%, while BOSC has yielded a comparatively lower 3.92% annualized return.


KINS

1D
2.63%
1M
8.04%
YTD
2.85%
6M
-0.92%
1Y
11.13%
3Y*
145.34%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
9.19%

BOSC

1D
2.77%
1M
-1.55%
YTD
-2.41%
6M
-2.63%
1Y
-12.06%
3Y*
10.37%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
3.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KINS vs. BOSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
2.85%11.54%613.15%57.78%-72.27%-22.97%-11.56%-54.74%-3.80%39.37%
BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.
-2.41%38.18%25.00%26.44%-28.86%29.30%14.07%-8.29%-0.91%3.30%

Correlation

The correlation between KINS and BOSC is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 1999

0.02

The correlation between KINS and BOSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (all time) to 0.12 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

KINS:

-$399.22

BOSC:

$0.83

PS Ratio

KINS:

0.00

BOSC:

0.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

KINS:

$59.92B

BOSC:

$50.57M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KINS:

$100.92M

BOSC:

$12.08M

EBITDA (TTM)

KINS:

-$6.57B

BOSC:

$4.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KINS vs. BOSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KINS
KINS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
KINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
KINS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
KINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
KINS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

BOSC
BOSC Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
BOSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOSC Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
BOSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOSC Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KINS vs. BOSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) and B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


KINSBOSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.99

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

-0.32

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.99

-0.52

+1.51

KINS vs. BOSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KINS Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the BOSC Sharpe Ratio of -0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KINS and BOSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

KINS vs. BOSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KINS drawdown since its inception was -96.97%, roughly equal to the maximum BOSC drawdown of -99.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KINS and BOSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KINSBOSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.97%

-99.61%

+2.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.22%

-37.73%

+13.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.84%

-39.13%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.60%

-59.35%

-31.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.20%

-64.34%

-31.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.59%

-98.75%

+79.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.24%

-87.82%

+38.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.23%

23.43%

-12.20%

Volatility

KINS vs. BOSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kingstone Companies, Inc. (KINS) is 7.92%, while B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. (BOSC) has a volatility of 14.84%. This indicates that KINS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KINSBOSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

14.84%

-6.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.57%

27.99%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.63%

43.69%

-4.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.73%

47.94%

+24.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.37%

51.86%

+7.51%

Dividends

KINS vs. BOSC - Dividend Comparison

KINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while BOSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BOSC
B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KINS
Kingstone Companies, Inc.
1.16%0.59%0.00%0.00%8.89%3.20%2.74%4.19%2.26%1.61%1.82%2.36%

Financials

KINS vs. BOSC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kingstone Companies, Inc. and B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
59.78B
12.62M
(KINS) Total Revenue
(BOSC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KINS vs. BOSC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kingstone Companies, Inc. and B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
23.9%
Portfolio components
KINS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 59.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

BOSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. reported a gross profit of 3.02M and revenue of 12.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 23.9%.

KINS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 59.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

BOSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. reported an operating income of 812.00K and revenue of 12.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.4%.

KINS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kingstone Companies, Inc. reported a net income of -5.81B and revenue of 59.78B, resulting in a net margin of -9.7%.

BOSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, B.O.S. Better Online Solutions Ltd. reported a net income of 819.00K and revenue of 12.62M, resulting in a net margin of 6.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


KINS and BOSC have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOSC has higher volatility (14.84%) compared to KINS (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KINS dropped -96.97% vs BOSC's -99.61%.

KINS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KINS and BOSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer